Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22892953›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2012

Myotonic dystrophy: is a narrow focus obscuring the rest of the field?

Mani S Mahadevan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. MyomiRNAs and myostatin as physical rehabilitation biomarkers for myotonic dystrophy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in neurology · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. RNA-binding protein misregulation in microsatellite expansion disorders.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2014
    Review
  15. RNA-mediated toxicity in neurodegenerative disease.Molecular and cellular neurosciences · 2013
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mani S MahadevanDepartment of Pathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. mahadevan@virginia.edu
University of Virginia · US

Funding

MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF THE MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY MUTATIONR01AR045992 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI MAHADEVAN, MANI SUBRAMANIAM · 1999 to 2013
$2.8M
Role of FN14 in RNA ToxicityR01AR062189 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI MAHADEVAN, MANI SUBRAMANIAM · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Inducible Transgenic Mouse Model of RNA ToxicityR01AR052771 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI MAHADEVAN, MANI SUBRAMANIAM · 2005 to 2009
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS AR045992NIAMS NIH HHS AR052771NIAMS NIH HHS AR062189NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR045992NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR052771NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe myotonic dystrophies (DM1 and DM2) are the paradigm for RNA toxicity in disease pathogenesis. The emphasis of this review will be on recent developments and issues in understanding the pathogenesis of DM1 and how this is driving the accelerated pace of translational and therapeutic developments. RECENT

findingsRNA toxicity in myotonic dystrophy is now associated with bi-directional antisense transcription, dysregulation of microRNAs and potentially non-ATG-mediated translation of homopolymeric toxic proteins. The role of other RNA-binding proteins beyond MBNL1 and CUGBP1, such as Staufen 1 and DDX5, are being identified and studied with respect to their role in myotonic dystrophy. New functions for MBNL1 in miR-1 biogenesis might have a clinically relevant role in myotonic dystrophy cardiac conduction defects and pathology. Advances are being made in identifying and characterizing small molecules with the potential to disrupt CUG-MBNL1 interactions. SUMMARY: Mechanisms of RNA toxicity are moving beyond a simplistic 'foci-centric' view of DM1 pathogenesis as a spliceopathy due to MBNL1 sequestration. Therapeutic development for myotonic dystrophy is moving rapidly with the development of antisense and small molecule therapies. Clinically, significant emphasis is being placed on biomarker discovery and outcome measures as an essential prelude to clinical trials.

Indexed as

AnimalsDefibrillators, ImplantableHumansMiceMutationMyotonic DystrophyRNARNA, AntisenseRNA-Binding ProteinsRNARNA, AntisenseRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22892953
PMCPMC4275308
OpenAlexW2039364812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.