ArticleJournal of plant research2013
Proteomic analysis of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) secretome.
Article in Journal of plant research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding the cold: integrated secretome profiling reveals extracellular adaptation mechanisms in Glaciozyma antarctica.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2026Article
- Beyond the surface: the plant secretome as a bridge between the cell and its environment.Planta · 2025Review
- Comparative secretome analysis between salinity-tolerant and control Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains.Planta · 2021Article
- Changes in the microsomal proteome of tomato fruit during ripening.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Article
- Functional genomics of tomato: opportunities and challenges in post-genome NGS era.Journal of biosciences · 2014Review
- Plant secretomics: identification, isolation, and biological significance under environmental stress.Plant signaling & behavior · 2014Review
- Uncovering plant-pathogen crosstalk through apoplastic proteomic studies.Frontiers in plant science · 2014Review
- Progress toward the tomato fruit cell wall proteome.Frontiers in plant science · 2013Article
- Plant secretome proteomics.Frontiers in plant science · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In fleshy fruits, fruit texture features are mainly related to chemical and mechanical properties of the cell wall. The description of tomato fruit cell wall proteome is a first step in the process of linking tomato genetic variability to fruit texture phenotypes. In this study, the proteome of 3 ripe tomato fruit lines with contrasted texture traits were studied. Weakly bound and soluble proteins were extracted from cell wall of the three cultivars using both destructive and non-destructive methods, respectively. Wall proteins were separated on 1D-PAGE, bands were excised and identified by LC-MS/MS. The software SignalP which searches for the leader peptide was used to discriminate between protein with or without signal peptide. In combine, seventy-five different cell wall proteins were recorded for both weakly bound and soluble cell wall fractions. The major identified functions included several proteins acting on polysaccharides, proteins involved in "lipid metabolism", proteins having interacting domain, "oxido-reductases" and "proteases" whose putative roles in ripe fruit cell wall is discussed. Several proteins with no obvious signal peptide, however, with accumulating supportive evidences to be bona fide wall proteins, were also identified. Some variations in protein repertories were observed among the lines, demonstrating the possibility to characterize cell wall protein genetic variability by such in muro proteome analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.