Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22891806›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2013

Prediction of free imatinib concentrations based on total plasma concentrations in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

Amina Haouala, Nicolas Widmer, Monia Guidi, Michael Montemurro, Serge Leyvraz, Thierry Buclin, Chin B Eap, Laurent A Decosterd, Chantal Csajka

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amina HaoualaDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicolas Widmer
Monia Guidi
Michael Montemurro
Serge Leyvraz
Thierry Buclin
Chin B Eap
Laurent A Decosterd
Chantal Csajka
University Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTotal imatinib concentrations are currently measured for the therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib, whereas only free drug equilibrates with cells for pharmacological action. Due to technical and cost limitations, routine measurement of free concentrations is generally not performed. In this study, free and total imatinib concentrations were measured to establish a model allowing the confident prediction of imatinib free concentrations based on total concentrations and plasma proteins measurements.

methodsOne hundred and fifty total and free plasma concentrations of imatinib were measured in 49 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours. A population pharmacokinetic model was built up to characterize mean total and free concentrations with inter-patient and intrapatient variability, while taking into account α1 -acid glycoprotein (AGP) and human serum albumin (HSA) concentrations, in addition to other demographic and environmental covariates.

resultsA one compartment model with first order absorption was used to characterize total and free imatinib concentrations. Only AGP influenced imatinib total clearance. Imatinib free concentrations were best predicted using a non-linear binding model to AGP, with a dissociation constant Kd of 319 ng ml(-1) , assuming a 1:1 molar binding ratio. The addition of HSA in the equation did not improve the prediction of imatinib unbound concentrations.

conclusionAlthough free concentration monitoring is probably more appropriate than total concentrations, it requires an additional ultrafiltration step and sensitive analytical technology, not always available in clinical laboratories. The model proposed might represent a convenient approach to estimate imatinib free concentrations. However, therapeutic ranges for free imatinib concentrations remain to be established before it enters into routine practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBenzamidesFemaleGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansImatinib MesylateMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalOrosomucoidPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesBenzamidesImatinib MesylateOrosomucoidPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesSerum Albumin

Identifiers

PMID22891806
PMCPMC3612719
OpenAlexW1963726169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.