Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22891317›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Single mutation to a sex pheromone receptor provides adaptive specificity between closely related moth species.

Greg P Leary, Jean E Allen, Peggy L Bunger, Jena B Luginbill, Charles E Linn, Irene E Macallister, Michael P Kavanaugh, Kevin W Wanner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular bases of insect odorant receptor function: specificity and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. TBM preferred to AlphaFold 3 for functional models of insect odorant receptors.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genetics and the Evolution of Prezygotic Isolation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Mating Pheromone (Gamone 1) inMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A tale of two copies: Evolutionary trajectories of moth pheromone receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Greg P LearyDepartment of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
Jean E Allen
Peggy L Bunger
Jena B Luginbill
Charles E Linn
Irene E Macallister
Michael P Kavanaugh
Kevin W Wanner

Funding

Physiology and Biophysics of Glutamate TransportR01NS033270 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA · PI KAVANAUGH, MICHAEL PATRICK · 1995 to 2008
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS033270NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS33270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex pheromone communication, acting as a prezygotic barrier to mating, is believed to have contributed to the speciation of moths and butterflies in the order Lepidoptera. Five decades after the discovery of the first moth sex pheromone, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that underlie the evolution of pheromone communication between closely related species. Although Asian and European corn borers (ACB and ECB) can be interbred in the laboratory, they are behaviorally isolated from mating naturally by their responses to subtly different sex pheromone isomers, (E)-12- and (Z)-12-tetradecenyl acetate and (E)-11- and (Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (ACB: E12, Z12; ECB; E11, Z11). Male moth olfactory systems respond specifically to the pheromone blend produced by their conspecific females. In vitro, ECB(Z) odorant receptor 3 (OR3), a sex pheromone receptor expressed in male antennae, responds strongly to E11 but also generally to the Z11, E12, and Z12 pheromones. In contrast, we show that ACB OR3, a gene that has been subjected to positive selection (ω = 2.9), responds preferentially to the ACB E12 and Z12 pheromones. In Ostrinia species the amino acid residue corresponding to position 148 in transmembrane domain 3 of OR3 is alanine (A), except for ACB OR3 that has a threonine (T) in this position. Mutation of this residue from A to T alters the pheromone recognition pattern by selectively reducing the E11 response ∼14-fold. These results suggest that discrete mutations that narrow the specificity of more broadly responsive sex pheromone receptors may provide a mechanism that contributes to speciation.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAdaptation, PhysiologicalAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsFemaleMaleMembrane PotentialsMolecular Sequence DataMothsOocytesPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReceptors, OdorantReceptors, PheromoneSex AttractantsSmellG-protein coupled receptor OR3Receptors, OdorantReceptors, PheromoneSex Attractants

Identifiers

PMID22891317
PMCPMC3435168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.