ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal
Next-generation transcatheter heart valves: current trials in Europe and the USA.
Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in the treatment of refractory gastrointestinal angiodysplasia.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Review
- Transcatheter valvular therapies in patients with left ventricular assist devices.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Predictive value of the Fibrosis-4 index in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022Article
- Quasi-isothermal modulated DSC as a valuable characterisation method for soft tissue biomaterial crosslinking reactions.Bioactive materials · 2020Article
- On the Mechanics of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2017Review
- Tissue-engineered heart valve with a tubular leaflet design for minimally invasive transcatheter implantation.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2015Article
- Clinical significance of conduction disturbances after aortic valve intervention: current evidence.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015Review
- Transcatheter aortic valve insertion (TAVI): a review.The British journal of radiology · 2014Review
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: current application and future directions.Current cardiology reports · 2013Review
- Vascular complications post-transcatheter aortic valve procedures.Indian heart journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has proven to be a viable alternative for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who are at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement. At the same time, there is increasing evidence that moderate-to-severe periprosthetic aortic regurgitation after TAVI is associated with dramatically increased mortality and morbidity. The issue of proper positioning of the valve, including the ability to reposition and recapture the device, must be dealt with before the use of TAVI can be extended to younger, healthier patients. The next generation of transcatheter heart valves will most likely address repositionability to facilitate accurate placement with additional features that minimize paravalvular leakage. Upcoming devices promise to improve outcomes and usability of current TAVI systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.