Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22890918›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2012

Mobilization of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells: general principles and molecular mechanisms.

Halvard Bonig, Thalia Papayannopoulou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Cell Sources for Human In vitro Bone Models.Current osteoporosis reports · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Halvard BonigDepartment of Medicine/Hematology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. hbonig@uw.edu
Thalia Papayannopoulou

Funding

Homing Determinants in Hemopoietic Stem/Progenitor CellsR01HL058734 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STAMATOYANNOPOULOS, THALIA · 1997 to 2011
$3.2M
Beta 1 integrins in erythropoiesisR01DK094702 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STAMATOYANNOPOULOS, THALIA · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL058734NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK094702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell mobilization can be achieved by a variety of bone marrow niche modifications, although efficient mobilization requires simultaneous expansion of the stem/progenitor cell pool and niche modification. Many of the mechanisms involved in G-CSF-induced mobilization have been described. With regard to mobilization of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, challenges for the future include the analysis of genetic factors responsible for the great variability in mobilization responses, and the identification of predictors of mobilization efficiency, as well as the development of mobilizing schemes for poor mobilizers. Moreover, improved regimens for enhanced or even preferential mobilization of nonhematopoietic stem/progenitor cell types, and their therapeutic potential for endogenous tissue repair will be questions to be vigorously pursued in the near future.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell MobilizationAnimalsCytokinesGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansCytokinesGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID22890918
PMCPMC3676430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.