ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2012
Translational bioinformatics embraces big data.
Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-life clinical data mining: generating hypotheses for evidence-based medicine.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Artificial Intelligence vs. Natural Stupidity: Evaluating AI readiness for the Vietnamese Medical Information System.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- The Scope of Big Data in One Medicine: Unprecedented Opportunities and Challenges.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2017Review
- New approach to generating insights for aging research based on literature mining and knowledge integration.PloS one · 2017Article
- Transcriptome marker diagnostics using big data.IET systems biology · 2016Article
- Toward a Literature-Driven Definition of Big Data in Healthcare.BioMed research international · 2015Review
- Big Data Usage Patterns in the Health Care Domain: A Use Case Driven Approach Applied to the Assessment of Vaccination Benefits and Risks. Contribution of the IMIA Primary Healthcare Working Group.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2014Review
- "Big data" and the electronic health record.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2014Review
- Big data and biomedical informatics: a challenging opportunity.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2014Article
- Some experiences and opportunities for big data in translational research.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2013Review
- "Drivers" of translational cancer epidemiology in the 21st century: needs and opportunities.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013Article
- crcTRP: a translational research platform for colorectal cancer.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2013Article
- Sharing big biomedical data.Journal of big dataArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We review the latest trends and major developments in translational bioinformatics in the year 2011-2012. Our emphasis is on highlighting the key events in the field and pointing at promising research areas for the future. The key take-home points are: • Translational informatics is ready to revolutionize human health and healthcare using large-scale measurements on individuals. • Data-centric approaches that compute on massive amounts of data (often called "Big Data") to discover patterns and to make clinically relevant predictions will gain adoption. • Research that bridges the latest multimodal measurement technologies with large amounts of electronic healthcare data is increasing; and is where new breakthroughs will occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22890354PMC4370941W2232806625What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.