Red blood cell storage lesion and adverse clinical outcomes: post hoc ergo propter hoc?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Using redox potential as a feasible marker for banked blood quality and the state of oxidative stress in stored red blood cells.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021
   Article
2. In vitro assessment of quality of citrate-phosphate-dextrose-adenine-1 preserved feline blood collected by a commercial closed system.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2018
   Article
3. Classic and alternative red blood cell storage strategies: seven years of "-omics" investigations.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2015
   Review
4. Deoxygenation of leucofiltered erythrocyte concentrates preserves proteome stability during storage in the blood bank.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2014
   Article
5. With or without you: a tale about oxygen removal from stored, packed erythrocytes.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2014
   Article
6. Shaking hands with the future through omics application in transfusion medicine and clinical biochemistry.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2012
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as