Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22890257›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2012

Ventilation with "clinically relevant" high tidal volumes does not promote stretch-induced injury in the lungs of healthy mice.

Michael R Wilson, Brijesh V Patel, Masao Takata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Unshrinking the baby lung to calm the VILI vortex.Critical care (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Translational Role of Rodent Models to Study Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury.Translational perioperative and pain medicine · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Secreted Extracellular Cyclophilin A Is a Novel Mediator of Ventilator-induced Lung Injury.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael R WilsonSection of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom. michael.wilson@imperial.ac.uk
Brijesh V Patel
Masao Takata
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 081208Wellcome Trust 092851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveVentilator-induced lung injury is a crucial determinant of the outcome of mechanically ventilated patients. Increasing numbers of mouse studies have identified numerous pathways and mediators that are modulated by ventilation, but it is conceptually difficult to reconcile these into a single paradigm. There is substantial variability in tidal volumes used in these studies and no certainty about the pathophysiology that such varied models actually represent. This study was designed to investigate whether ventilation strategies ranging from "very high" to more "clinically relevant" tidal volumes induce similar pathophysiologies in healthy mice or represent distinct entities.

designIn vivo study.

settingUniversity research laboratory. SUBJECTS: C57/Bl6 mice.

interventionsAnesthetized mice were ventilated with various tidal volumes up to 40 mL/kg. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsRespiratory system compliance and arterial blood gases were used to evaluate physiological variables of injury. Lung wet:dry weight ratio, lavage fluid protein, and cytokines were used to assess pulmonary edema and inflammation. All ventilation strategies induced changes in respiratory system compliance, although the pattern of change was unique for each strategy. Ventilation with 10 mL/kg and 40 mL/kg also induced decreases in arterial PO2 and blood pressure. Any physiological changes induced during the 10, 20, and 30 mL/kg strategies were largely reversed by recruitment maneuvers at the end of the protocol. Markers of pulmonary edema and inflammation indicated that only 40 mL/kg induced substantial increases in both, consistent with development of lung injury.

conclusionsTidal volumes up to 20 mL/kg are unlikely to induce substantial lung overstretch in models using healthy, young mice. Signs of injury/inflammation using such models are likely to result from other factors, particularly alveolar derecruitment and atelectasis. The results of such studies may need to be reevaluated before clinical relevance can be accurately determined.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood Gas AnalysisHemodynamicsInflammationMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPulmonary EdemaRespiration, ArtificialTidal VolumeTime FactorsVentilator-Induced Lung Injury

Identifiers

PMID22890257
PMCPMC3698535
OpenAlexW1995569829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.