Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22889923›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2012

Another view of the history of antipsychotic drug discovery and development.

W T Carpenter, J M Davis

Abstract readHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The 3q OncogeneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Modulation of extrasynaptic GABANature communications · 2019
    Article
  11. Documentation of antipsychotic-related adverse drug reactions: An educational intervention.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2019
    Article
  12. How Neuroscience Is Informing Treatments: Ethical Issues.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

W T CarpenterDepartment of Psychiatry, Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. wcarpent@mprc.umaryland.edu
J M Davis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlorpromazine initiated effective pharmacotherapy for schizophrenia 60 years ago. This discovery initiated or stimulated key developments in the field of psychiatry. Nonetheless, advances in pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia have been modest. Psychosis remains the primary aspect of psychopathology addressed, and core pathologies such as cognition and negative symptom remain unmet therapeutic challenges. New clinical and basic neuroscience paradigms may guide the near future and provide a more heuristic construct for novel and innovative discovery.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsChlorpromazineDrug DiscoveryHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansSchizophreniaAntipsychotic AgentsChlorpromazine

Identifiers

PMID22889923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.