Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22889910›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2012

Protein abundance is key to distinguish promiscuous from functional phosphorylation based on evolutionary information.

Emmanuel D Levy, Stephen W Michnick, Christian R Landry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The fitness cost of spurious phosphorylation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparative transcriptome analysis and identification of candidate adaptive evolution genes ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mutation Edgotype Drives Fitness Effect in Human.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Phospho-Regulation of Meiotic Prophase.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  18. The evolutionary scaling of cellular traits imposed by the drift barrier.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. A Theoretical Framework for Evolutionary Cell Biology.Journal of molecular biology · 2020
    Review
  20. Multiple Site-Specific Phosphorylation of IDPs Monitored by NMR.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emmanuel D LevyDépartement de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. emmanuel.levy@gmail.com
Stephen W Michnick
Christian R Landry

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research GMX-191597Canadian Institutes of Health Research GMX-192838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In eukaryotic cells, protein phosphorylation is an important and widespread mechanism used to regulate protein function. Yet, of the thousands of phosphosites identified to date, only a few hundred at best have a characterized function. It was recently shown that these functional sites are significantly more conserved than phosphosites of unknown function, stressing the importance of considering evolutionary conservation in assessing the global functional landscape of phosphosites. This leads us to review studies that examined the impact of phosphorylation on evolutionary conservation. While all these studies have shown that conservation is greater among phosphorylated sites compared with non-phosphorylated ones, the magnitude of this difference varies greatly. Further, not all studies have considered key factors that may influence the rate of phosphosite evolution. Such key factors are their localization in ordered or disordered regions, their stoichiometry or the abundance of their corresponding protein. Here we take into account all of these factors simultaneously, which reveals remarkable evolutionary patterns. First, while it is well established that protein conservation increases with abundance, we show that phosphosites partly follow an opposite trend. More precisely, Saccharomyces cerevisiae phosphosites present among abundant proteins are 1.5 times more likely to diverge in the closely related species Saccharomyces bayanus when compared with phosphosites present in the 5 per cent least abundant proteins. Second, we show that conservation is coupled to stoichiometry, whereby sites frequently phosphorylated are more conserved than those rarely phosphorylated. Finally, we provide a model of functional and noisy or 'accidental' phosphorylation that explains these observations.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhosphorylationAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBinding SitesConserved SequenceHumansPhosphitesPhosphoproteinsProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomicsSaccharomycesSequence AlignmentSpecies SpecificityPhosphitesPhosphoproteins

Identifiers

PMID22889910
PMCPMC3415844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.