Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22889855›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2012

BRCA1 R1699Q variant displaying ambiguous functional abrogation confers intermediate breast and ovarian cancer risk.

Amanda B Spurdle, Phillip J Whiley, Bryony Thompson, Bingjian Feng, Sue Healey, Melissa A Brown, Christopher Pettigrew, kConFab, Christi J Van Asperen, Margreet G E M Ausems and 28 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01689584 (Study of Family COsegregation of Nucleotide VARiants in the Panel of Genes to Validate Their Use in Genetic Counseling), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01689584 narecruitingnot on this map

Study of Family COsegregation of Nucleotide VARiants in the Panel of Genes to Validate Their Use in Genetic Counseling

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut CurieRan2012 to 2038Enrolled11,000ConditionsGene Mutation-Related Cancer, Genetic PredispositionArmssalivary kit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comprehensive evidence for the pathogenicity of theJournal of medical genetics · 2026
    Article
  6. GermlineCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Case Report: BiallelicFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors at 19 institutions in 10 countries.

Amanda B SpurdleDivision of Genetics and Population Health, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Amanda.Spurdle@qimr.edu.au
Phillip J Whiley
Bryony Thompson
Bingjian Feng
Sue Healey
Melissa A Brown
Christopher Pettigrew
kConFab
Christi J Van Asperen
Margreet G E M Ausems
Anna A Kattentidt-Mouravieva
Ans M W van den Ouweland
Dutch Belgium UV Consortium
Annika Lindblom
Maritta H Pigg
Rita K Schmutzler
Christoph Engel
Alfons Meindl
German Consortium of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer
Sandrine Caputo
Olga M Sinilnikova
Rosette Lidereau
French COVAR group collaborators
Fergus J Couch
Lucia Guidugli
Thomas van Overeem Hansen
Mads Thomassen
Diana M Eccles
Kathy Tucker
Javier Benitez
Susan M Domchek
Amanda E Toland
Elizabeth J Van Rensburg
Barbara Wappenschmidt
Åke Borg
Maaike P G Vreeswijk
David E Goldgar
ENIGMA Consortium
The University of Queensland · AUMayo Clinic · USUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Utah · USCancer Genetics (United States) · USErasmus MC · NLInserm · FRLeiden University Medical Center · NLOdense University Hospital · DKQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUSpanish National Cancer Research Centre · ESKarolinska Institutet · SELeipzig University · DELund University · SETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUppsala University · SEUtrecht University · NL

Funding

The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
BRCA2 missense mutations and breast cancerR01CA116167 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH · 2007 to 2011
$3.0M
BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense mutations and breast cancer riskU01CA116167 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH · 2013 to 2017
$2.7M
Genetic interactions in colorectal cancer susceptibilityR01CA134461 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TOLAND, AMANDA EWART · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA116167NCI NIH HHS CA116167ZNCI NIH HHS CA116201NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NCI NIH HHS R01 CA116167NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical classification of rare sequence changes identified in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 is essential for appropriate genetic counselling of individuals carrying these variants. We previously showed that variant BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln in the BRCA1 transcriptional transactivation domain demonstrated equivocal results from a series of functional assays, and proposed that this variant may confer low to moderate risk of cancer.

methodsMeasures of genetic risk (report of family history, segregation) were assessed for 68 BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) families recruited through family cancer clinics, comparing results with 34 families carrying the previously classified pathogenic BRCA1 c.5095C>T p.Arg1699Trp (R1699W) mutation at the same residue, and to 243 breast cancer families with no BRCA1 pathogenic mutation (BRCA-X).

resultsComparison of BRCA1 carrier prediction scores of probands using the BOADICEA risk prediction tool revealed that BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln variant carriers had family histories that were less 'BRCA1-like' than BRCA1 c.5095C>T p.Arg1699Trp mutation carriers (p<0.00001), but more 'BRCA1-like' than BRCA-X families (p=0.0004). Further, modified segregation analysis of the subset of 30 families with additional genotyping showed that BRCA1 c.5096G >A p.Arg1699Gln had reduced penetrance compared with the average truncating BRCA1 mutation penetrance (p=0.0002), with estimated cumulative risks to age 70 of breast or ovarian cancer of 24%.

conclusionsOur results provide substantial evidence that the BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) variant, demonstrating ambiguous functional deficiency across multiple assays, is associated with intermediate risk of breast and ovarian cancer, highlighting challenges for risk modelling and clinical management of patients of this and other potential moderate-risk variants.

Indexed as

MutationAgedBRCA1 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGenotyping TechniquesHEK293 CellsHumansLikelihood FunctionsOvarian NeoplasmsPedigreePenetrancePredictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22889855
PMCPMC3810416
OpenAlexW2161298097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.