ArticleMinimally invasive surgery2012
Single-incision laparoscopic surgeries for colorectal diseases: early experiences of a novel surgical method.
Article in Minimally invasive surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Outcomes of Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients With Sigmoid Colon Cancer: Surgery With 1 Surgeon and 1 Camera Operator.Annals of coloproctology · 2018Article
- The single-incision laparoscopic surgery technique has questionable advantages in colorectal surgery.Innovative surgical sciences · 2018Article
- Z skin incision in reduced-port surgery for colorectal cancer.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2016Article
- Initial experience of reduced port surgery using a two-surgeon technique for colorectal cancer.BMC surgery · 2015Article
- Single-Incision Robotic Colectomy (SIRC) case series: initial experience at a single center.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Article
- Single-incision assisted laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in the treatment of an intussusception induced by a solitary hamartomatous polyp: a case report and review of the literature.Journal of medical case reports · 2015Review
- Micro-laparoscopic colectomy: initial experience.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2015Article
- New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Laparoscopic resection of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors with special contribution of radionuclide imaging.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Mini-invasive surgery for colorectal cancer.Chinese journal of cancer · 2014Review
- Single-incision laparoscopic cecectomy for low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm after laparoscopic rectectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2014Article
- Three ports laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: a step on refining of reduced port surgery.ISRN surgery · 2014Article
- Single-incision (with multi-input single-port) laparoscopic colorectal procedures: Early results.Ulusal cerrahi dergisi · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives. This paper aims to analyze the feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) and its potential benefits. Methods. Systematic review was performed for the years 1983-August 2011 to retrieve all relevant literature. A total of 21 studies with 477 patients undergoing SILC were selected. Results. Range of operative times and estimated blood losses were 75-229 min and 0-100 mL, respectively. Overall conversion rate was 5.9% (28/477) and an additional laparoscopic port was used in 4.9% (16/329) cases. Range of lymph node number for malignant cases was 12-24.6 and surgical margins were all negative. Overall mortality and morbidity rate was 0.4% (2/477) and 11.7% (43/368), respectively. The length of hospital stay (LOS) varied across reports (2.7-9.2 days). Among 6 case-matched studies, one showed less blood loss in SILC as compared to LAC and 2 showed shorter LOS after SILC versus HALC or LAC/HALC groups. In addition, one study reported maximum pain score on postoperative days 1 and 2 was lower in SILS compared to LAC and HALC. Conclusions. SILC procedure is feasible and safe when performed by surgeons highly skilled in laparoscopy. In spite of technical difficulties, there may be potential benefits associated with SILC over LAC/HALC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.