ArticleGastrointestinal cancer research : GCR2012
A Multi-institutional Phase 2 Study of Imatinib Mesylate and Gemcitabine for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.
Article in Gastrointestinal cancer research : GCR, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00161213 (Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate and Gemcitabine for First-line Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate and Gemcitabine for First-line Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- A phase I trial of cabozantinib and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer.Investigational new drugs · 2016Trial
- Interaction of Avapritinib with Congo Red in Pancreatic Cancer Cells: Molecular Modeling and Biophysical Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Molecular Research in Pancreatic Cancer: Small Molecule Inhibitors, Their Mechanistic Pathways and Beyond.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Review
- A new era: tumor microenvironment in chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer.Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics · 2022Article
- Review
- Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Therapeutics Targeting RTK and TGF Beta Receptor.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Tumor microenvironment as a therapeutic target in cancer.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2021Review
- Small molecule inhibitors in pancreatic cancer.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2020Review
- β-catenin-activated autocrine PDGF/Src signaling is a therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer.Theranostics · 2019Article
- Complex roles of the stroma in the intrinsic resistance to gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer: where we are and where we are going.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2017Review
- Imatinib could be a new strategy for pulmonary hypertension caused by pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy in metastatic breast cancer.SpringerPlus · 2016Article
- Nintedanib, a triple angiokinase inhibitor, enhances cytotoxic therapy response in pancreatic cancer.Cancer letters · 2015Article
- Sphingosine-1-phosphate mediates a reciprocal signaling pathway between stellate cells and cancer cells that promotes pancreatic cancer growth.The American journal of pathology · 2014Article
- A Case of Recurrent Breast Cancer Identified by Pulmonary Tumor Thrombotic Microangiopathy.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe pancreatic tumor microenvironment is rich in receptors for platelet-derived growth factor (PDGFRs). Imatinib mesylate (IM) inhibits PDGFRs and decreases tumor interstitial fluid pressure, potentially improving drug access. These data and promising results in a phase 1 trial formed the rationale for a phase 2 trial combining IM and gemcitabine (GEM) in pancreatic cancer.
methodsEligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer; ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status ≤2; and adequate end-organ function. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included response rate, toxicity, and overall survival (OS). GEM was given at 1200 mg/m(2)/120 min on days 3 and 10. IM (400 mg) was taken orally on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12 of a 21-day cycle. Response was assessed every 3 cycles.
resultsForty-four patients from 7 centers were enrolled from October 2005 through July 2009. Median age was 62 years. The median number of cycles completed was 3 (range, 0-17). Common adverse effects included neutropenia, nausea, anemia, and fatigue. Half the patients required dose reductions. There were no complete responses to therapy. During treatment, 1 patient showed a partial response, 16 had stable disease, and 18 had progressive disease. The median PFS was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval, 2.1-5.1), the median OS was 6.3 months (95% confidence interval, 5.2-8.5), and the 1-year survival rate was 25.6% (95% confidence interval, 13.8-39.1).
conclusionIM in combination with GEM is tolerated in locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent pancreatic cancer, but does not show a statistically significant PFS or OS benefit over chemotherapy with GEM alone.
Identifiers
22888387PMC3415717W2409944979What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.