Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22888387›Full record

ArticleGastrointestinal cancer research : GCR2012

A Multi-institutional Phase 2 Study of Imatinib Mesylate and Gemcitabine for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Rebecca A Moss, Dirk Moore, Mary F Mulcahy, Kenneth Nahum, Biren Saraiya, Simantini Eddy, Martin Kleber, Elizabeth A Poplin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastrointestinal cancer research : GCR, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00161213 (Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate and Gemcitabine for First-line Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00161213 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate and Gemcitabine for First-line Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Medicine and Dentistry of New JerseyRan2005 to 2010Enrolled44ConditionsPancreatic CancerArmsgemcitabine hydrochloride, imatinib mesylate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A new era: tumor microenvironment in chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer.Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Therapeutics Targeting RTK and TGF Beta Receptor.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca A Moss
Dirk Moore
Mary F Mulcahy
Kenneth Nahum
Biren Saraiya
Simantini Eddy
Martin Kleber
Elizabeth A Poplin
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USJersey Shore University Medical Center · USPalmetto Hematology Oncology · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILINGP30CA072720 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Chang S Chan · 1997 to 2026
$94.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA072720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pancreatic tumor microenvironment is rich in receptors for platelet-derived growth factor (PDGFRs). Imatinib mesylate (IM) inhibits PDGFRs and decreases tumor interstitial fluid pressure, potentially improving drug access. These data and promising results in a phase 1 trial formed the rationale for a phase 2 trial combining IM and gemcitabine (GEM) in pancreatic cancer.

methodsEligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer; ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status ≤2; and adequate end-organ function. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included response rate, toxicity, and overall survival (OS). GEM was given at 1200 mg/m(2)/120 min on days 3 and 10. IM (400 mg) was taken orally on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12 of a 21-day cycle. Response was assessed every 3 cycles.

resultsForty-four patients from 7 centers were enrolled from October 2005 through July 2009. Median age was 62 years. The median number of cycles completed was 3 (range, 0-17). Common adverse effects included neutropenia, nausea, anemia, and fatigue. Half the patients required dose reductions. There were no complete responses to therapy. During treatment, 1 patient showed a partial response, 16 had stable disease, and 18 had progressive disease. The median PFS was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval, 2.1-5.1), the median OS was 6.3 months (95% confidence interval, 5.2-8.5), and the 1-year survival rate was 25.6% (95% confidence interval, 13.8-39.1).

conclusionIM in combination with GEM is tolerated in locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent pancreatic cancer, but does not show a statistically significant PFS or OS benefit over chemotherapy with GEM alone.

Identifiers

PMID22888387
PMCPMC3415717
OpenAlexW2409944979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.