Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22888317›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2012

Building blocks of self-sustained activity in a simple deterministic model of excitable neural networks.

Guadalupe C Garcia, Annick Lesne, Marc-Thorsten Hütt, Claus C Hilgetag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Link-usage asymmetry and collective patterns emerging from rich-club organization of complex networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Is the brain really a small-world network?Brain structure & function · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Perspective: network-guided pattern formation of neural dynamics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guadalupe C GarciaSchool of Engineering and Science, Jacobs University Bremen Bremen, Germany.
Annick Lesne
Marc-Thorsten Hütt
Claus C Hilgetag

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the interplay of topology and dynamics of excitable neural networks is one of the major challenges in computational neuroscience. Here we employ a simple deterministic excitable model to explore how network-wide activation patterns are shaped by network architecture. Our observables are co-activation patterns, together with the average activity of the network and the periodicities in the excitation density. Our main results are: (1) the dependence of the correlation between the adjacency matrix and the instantaneous (zero time delay) co-activation matrix on global network features (clustering, modularity, scale-free degree distribution), (2) a correlation between the average activity and the amount of small cycles in the graph, and (3) a microscopic understanding of the contributions by 3-node and 4-node cycles to sustained activity.

Indexed as

cellular automatoncyclesexcitable dynamicsself-sustained activity

Identifiers

PMID22888317
PMCPMC3412572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.