Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22887753›Full record

ArticleCytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.)2012

Centralspindlin and chromosomal passenger complex behavior during normal and Rappaport furrow specification in echinoderm embryos.

Haroula Argiros, Lauren Henson, Christiana Holguin, Victoria Foe, Charles Bradley Shuster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Going with the flow: insights fromPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Centralspindlin: at the heart of cytokinesis.Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haroula ArgirosDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA.
Lauren Henson
Christiana Holguin
Victoria Foe
Charles Bradley Shuster
New Mexico State University · USLuxel (United States) · US

Funding

ZUNI HEALTH INITIATIVE-PILOT STUDYP20RR016480 · NCRR · NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY LAS CRUCES · PI ZHANG, PENG F · 2001 to 2011
$33.7M
GENE NETWORKS: FROM MOLECULES TO MECHANISTIC MODELSP50GM066050 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ODELL, GARRETT M · 2002 to 2010
$12.0M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016480NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR16480NIGMS NIH HHS 5P50 GM666050-02NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM066050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chromosomal passenger (CPC) and Centralspindlin complexes are essential for organizing the anaphase central spindle and providing cues that position the cytokinetic furrow between daughter nuclei. However, echinoderm zygotes are also capable of forming "Rappaport furrows" between asters positioned back-to-back without intervening chromosomes. To understand how these complexes contribute to normal and Rappaport furrow formation, we studied the localization patterns of Survivin and mitotic-kinesin-like-protein1 (MKLP1), members respectively of the CPC and the Centralspindlin complex, and the effect of CPC inhibition on cleavage in mono- and binucleate echinoderm zygotes. In zygotes, Survivin initially localized to metaphase chromosomes, upon anaphase onset relocalized to the central spindle and then, together with MKLP1 spread towards the equatorial cortex in an Aurora-dependent manner. Inhibition of Aurora kinase activity resulted in disruption of central spindle organization and furrow regression, although astral microtubule elongation and furrow initiation were normal. In binucleate cells containing two parallel spindles MKLP1 and Survivin localized to the plane of the former metaphase plate, but were not observed in the secondary cleavage plane formed between unrelated spindle poles, except when chromosomes were abnormally present there. However, the secondary furrow was sensitive to Aurora inhibition, indicating that Aurora kinase may still contribute to furrow ingression without chromosomes nearby. Our results provide insights that reconcile classic micromanipulation studies with current molecular understanding of furrow specification in animal cells.

Indexed as

CytokinesisAnimalsAurora KinasesCell Cycle ProteinsChromosome PositioningChromosomesEmbryo, NonmammalianProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein TransportSea UrchinsSignal TransductionZygoteAurora KinasesCell Cycle ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID22887753
PMCPMC3926696
OpenAlexW1972906007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.