ArticleRheumatology international2013
The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of anti-citrulline antibody test in diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Poor accuracy of anti-citrulline antibody test in diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis in Iran.Rheumatology international · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Citrulline antibody, nowadays, is a new item which has been the center of attention due to its much more specificity to diagnose RA. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and accuracy of anti-citrulline antibody test in RA diagnosis among hospitalized patients in Iran. Through a case-control study, we tried to calculate the accuracy of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) test used in the diagnosis of RA enrolling 200 participants divided into two groups of the patients with RA, on the one hand, and other diseases, on the other. Anti-CCP was measured by ELISA technique through which titers more than 15 were defined as high titer. Of all the studied population, 81 (81 %) were in active phase of RA, which had anti-CCP >15 U/ml, while only 25 controls (25 %) experienced these levels. The average anti-CCP was 144 U/ml in cases and 16.05 U/ml in controls with a P value <0.001, which confirmed significant difference between the two. Considering different comments on this matter besides our findings in the present research, we offer a combination of anti-citrulline antibody test rather than anti-CCP and RF to get the best results in RA diagnosis, discrimination and prognosis because of 97 % specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22886510What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.