Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22885750›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2012

Yeast communities of diverse Drosophila species: comparison of two symbiont groups in the same hosts.

James Angus Chandler, Jonathan A Eisen, Artyom Kopp

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 181 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Scent and adhesion drive insect dispersal of environmental yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Gut microbiome of the grape berry moth,Microbial genomics · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Infection and immunity · 2025
    Review
  15. Discovery and identification of a novel yeast species,International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James Angus ChandlerDepartment of Evolution and Ecology and Center for Population Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA. jschandler@ucdavis.edu
Jonathan A Eisen
Artyom Kopp
University of California, Davis · USJoint Genome Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of ecological diversity with genetic and experimental tractability makes Drosophila a powerful model for the study of animal-associated microbial communities. Despite the known importance of yeasts in Drosophila physiology, behavior, and fitness, most recent work has focused on Drosophila-bacterial interactions. In order to get a more complete understanding of the Drosophila microbiome, we characterized the yeast communities associated with different Drosophila species collected around the world. We focused on the phylum Ascomycota because it constitutes the vast majority of the Drosophila-associated yeasts. Our sampling strategy allowed us to compare the distribution and structure of the yeast and bacterial communities in the same host populations. We show that yeast communities are dominated by a small number of abundant taxa, that the same yeast lineages are associated with different host species and populations, and that host diet has a greater effect than host species on yeast community composition. These patterns closely parallel those observed in Drosophila bacterial communities. However, we do not detect a significant correlation between the yeast and bacterial communities of the same host populations. Comparative analysis of different symbiont groups provides a more comprehensive picture of host-microbe interactions. Future work on the role of symbiont communities in animal physiology, ecological adaptation, and evolution would benefit from a similarly holistic approach.

Indexed as

BiodiversitySymbiosisAnimalsAscomycotaBacteriaDNA, FungalDrosophilaMolecular Sequence DataSequence Analysis, DNAUnited StatesYeastsDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID22885750
PMCPMC3457106
OpenAlexW2111215148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.