Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22884974›Full record

ReviewAgeing research reviews2013

Senescence in natural populations of animals: widespread evidence and its implications for bio-gerontology.

Daniel H Nussey, Hannah Froy, Jean-François Lemaitre, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Steve N Austad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ageing research reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 218 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
218citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

218 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular evolution of animal aging.The EMBO journal · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Why we age.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Migration shapes senescence in a long-lived bird.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

158 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel H NusseyInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK. dan.nussey@ed.ac.uk
Hannah Froy
Jean-François Lemaitre
Jean-Michel Gaillard
Steve N Austad

Funding

TRANSGENIC COREP30AG013319 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI PETER J HORNSBY · 1995 to 2026
$30.6M
Can Rapamycin Retard Age-Related Diseases?RC2AG036613 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI RICHARDSON, ARLAN G. · 2009 to 2010
$5.2M
Development of a Barrier Colony of Common Marmosets (R24)R24RR023344 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI AUSTAD, STEVEN N. · 2010 to 2011
$1.2M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H021868/1NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR023344NIA NIH HHS P30 AG013319NIA NIH HHS P30 AG13319NIA NIH HHS RC2 AG036613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

That senescence is rarely, if ever, observed in natural populations is an oft-quoted fallacy within bio-gerontology. We identify the roots of this fallacy in the otherwise seminal works of Medawar and Comfort, and explain that under antagonistic pleiotropy or disposable soma explanations for the evolution of senescence there is no reason why senescence cannot evolve to be manifest within the life expectancies of wild organisms. The recent emergence of long-term field studies presents irrefutable evidence that senescence is commonly detected in nature. We found such evidence in 175 different animal species from 340 separate studies. Although the bulk of this evidence comes from birds and mammals, we also found evidence for senescence in other vertebrates and insects. We describe how high-quality longitudinal field data allow us to test evolutionary explanations for differences in senescence between the sexes and among traits and individuals. Recent studies indicate that genes, prior environment and investment in growth and reproduction influence aging rates in the wild. We argue that - with the fallacy that wild animals do not senesce finally dead and buried - collaborations between bio-gerontologists and field biologists can begin to test the ecological generality of purportedly 'public' mechanisms regulating aging in laboratory models.

Indexed as

GeriatricsAgingAnimalsAnimals, WildBiological EvolutionEnvironmentFemaleMaleNatural HistorySex Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID22884974
PMCPMC4246505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.