Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22884967›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2012

Shear strength behavior of human trabecular bone.

Arnav Sanyal, Atul Gupta, Harun H Bayraktar, Ronald Y Kwon, Tony M Keaveny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Efficient materially nonlinearBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Biomechanics and mechanobiology of trabecular bone: a review.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Osteoporosis, fractures, and diabetes.International journal of endocrinology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arnav SanyalOrthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1740 , USA. arnavsanyal@berkeley.edu
Atul Gupta
Harun H Bayraktar
Ronald Y Kwon
Tony M Keaveny

Funding

MULTIAXIAL STRENGTH BEHAVIOR OF HUMAN TRABECULAR BONER01AR043784 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KEAVENY, TONY M · 1996 to 2010
$2.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS AR43784NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR043784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shear strength of human trabecular bone may influence overall bone strength under fall loading conditions and failure at bone-implant interfaces. Here, we sought to compare shear and compressive yield strengths of human trabecular bone and elucidate the underlying failure mechanisms. We analyzed 54 specimens (5-mm cubes), all aligned with the main trabecular orientation and spanning four anatomic sites, 44 different cadavers, and a wide range of bone volume fraction (0.06-0.38). Micro-CT-based non-linear finite element analysis was used to assess the compressive and shear strengths and the spatial distribution of yielded tissue; the tissue-level constitutive model allowed for kinematic non-linearity and yielding with strength asymmetry. We found that the computed values of both the shear and compressive strengths depended on bone volume fraction via power law relations having an exponent of 1.7 (R(2)=0.95 shear; R(2)=0.97 compression). The ratio of shear to compressive strengths (mean±SD, 0.44±0.16) did not depend on bone volume fraction (p=0.24) but did depend on microarchitecture, most notably the intra-trabecular standard deviation in trabecular spacing (R(2)=0.23, p<0.005). For shear, the main tissue-level failure mode was tensile yield of the obliquely oriented trabeculae. By contrast, for compression, specimens having low bone volume fraction failed primarily by large-deformation-related tensile yield of horizontal trabeculae and those having high bone volume failed primarily by compressive yield of vertical trabeculae. We conclude that human trabecular bone is generally much weaker in shear than compression at the apparent level, reflecting different failure mechanisms at the tissue level.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBone and BonesCompressive StrengthFemaleFinite Element AnalysisHumansMaleMiddle AgedShear Strength

Identifiers

PMID22884967
PMCPMC3462285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.