ArticleBehavioural brain research2012
Effects of test experience and neocortical microgyria on spatial and non-spatial learning in rats.
Article in Behavioural brain research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developmental Alterations in Cortical Organization and Socialization in Adolescents Who Sustained a Traumatic Brain Injury in Early Childhood.Journal of neurotrauma · 2021Article
- TrkB-enhancer facilitates functional recovery after traumatic brain injury.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Immuno-modulator inter-alpha inhibitor proteins ameliorate complex auditory processing deficits in rats with neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2017Article
- Effects of inter-alpha inhibitor proteins on neonatal brain injury: Age, task and treatment dependent neurobehavioral outcomes.Experimental neurology · 2014Article
- A behavioral evaluation of sex differences in a mouse model of severe neuronal migration disorder.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neocortical neuronal migration anomalies such as microgyria and heterotopia have been associated with developmental language learning impairments in humans, and rapid auditory processing deficits in rodent models. Similar processing impairments have been suggested to play a causal role in human language impairment. Recent data from our group has shown spatial working memory deficits associated with neocortical microgyria in rats. Similar deficits have also been identified in humans with language learning impairments. To further explore the extent of learning deficits associated with cortical neuronal migration anomalies, we evaluated the effects of neocortical microgyria and test order experience using spatial (Morris water maze) and non-spatial water maze learning paradigms. Two independent groups were employed (G1 or G2) incorporating both microgyria and sham conditions. G1 received spatial testing for five days followed by non-spatial testing, while the reverse order was followed for G2. Initial analysis, including both test groups and both maze conditions, revealed a main effect of treatment, with microgyric rats performing significantly worse than shams. Overall analysis also revealed a task by order interaction, indicating that each group performed better on the second task as compared to the first, regardless of which task was presented first. Independent analyses of each task revealed a significant effect of treatment (microgyria worse than sham) only for the spatial water maze condition. Results indicate that prior maze experience (regardless of task type) leads to better subsequent performance. Results suggest that behavioral abnormalities associated with microgyria extend beyond auditory and working memory deficits seen in previous studies, to include spatial but not non-spatial learning impairments and that non-specific test experience may improve behavioral performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.