Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22884606›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2012

Reinstatement of methamphetamine conditioned place preference in nicotine-sensitized rats.

Jennifer N Berry, Nichole M Neugebauer, Michael T Bardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer N BerryUniversity of Kentucky, Department of Psychology, Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, B449 Biomedical and Biological Sciences Research Building, 741 S. Limestone St., Lexington, KY 40536-0509, United States.
Nichole M Neugebauer
Michael T Bardo

Funding

Training and Pilot CoreP50DA005312 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KELLY, THOMAS H. · 1987 to 2016
$19.5M
Development of Novel Therapies or Methamphetamine AbuseR01DA013519 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DWOSKIN, LINDA P · 2000 to 2009
$5.1M
Training in Drug Abuse Related Research.T32DA016176 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DWOSKIN, LINDA P · 2004 to 2020
$4.0M
NOVELTY, DOPAMINE AND RESPONSE TO AMPHETAMINER01DA012964 · NIDA · YAUPON THERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI BARDO, MICHAEL T · 2000 to 2013
$3.7M
Development of Novel Therapies or Methamphetamine AbuseU01DA013519 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DWOSKIN, LINDA P · 2012 to 2016
$3.2M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE BEHAVIORT32DA007304 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI RUSH, CRAIG R · 1998 to 2012
$3.1M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA005312NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA05312NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012964NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013519NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007304NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA016176NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA013519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current experiments examined the effects of repeated nicotine prior to acquisition, extinction, and reinstatement of methamphetamine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP). Methamphetamine-induced (METH; 0.25, 0.5, or 1 mg/kg, s.c.) CPP was established using separate groups of adult male Sprague-Dawley rats with an unbiased conditioning procedure. Following extinction of METH CPP, drug-primed reinstatement (0, 0.25, 0.5 or 1 mg/kg, s.c.) of METH CPP was assessed in order to determine whether METH-induced reinstatement depends on the METH dose used to induce CPP. In a second experiment, separate groups of rats received nicotine (NIC; 0 or 0.2 mg/kg, s.c.) for 7 days prior to undergoing METH (0 or 0.5 mg/kg, s.c.) conditioning, extinction, and drug-primed reinstatement. Results indicate that METH-primed reinstatement varied as a function of dose such that priming with the conditioning dose did not reinstate CPP, but reinstatement was observed following priming doses of METH that were either lower or higher than the conditioning dose. Prior NIC exposure had no effect on METH CPP, extinction, or reinstatement. Interestingly, at a METH dose (0.5 mg/kg) that did not induce reinstatement alone, acute NIC (0.2 mg/kg) in combination with METH induced reinstatement, suggesting that NIC produced a leftward shift in the dose-response effect of METH to reinstate CPP. These studies indicate that prior NIC exposure may not be necessary for enhancement of the rewarding effects of METH, in contrast to previous self-administration reports.

Indexed as

RewardAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsCentral Nervous System SensitizationCentral Nervous System StimulantsConditioning, OperantDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsMethamphetamineNicotineNicotinic AgonistsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTime FactorsCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethamphetamineNicotineNicotinic Agonists

Identifiers

PMID22884606
PMCPMC3445737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.