ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2012
The Nordic Maintenance Care Program: Maintenance care - what happens during the consultation? Observations and patient questionnaires.
Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chiropractic maintenance care - what's new? A systematic review of the literature.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2019Pooled it
- Development and evaluation of the MAINTAIN instrument, selecting patients suitable for secondary or tertiary preventive manual care: the Nordic maintenance care program.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2022Trial
- The Nordic maintenance care program: maintenance care reduces the number of days with pain in acute episodes and increases the length of pain free periods for dysfunctional patients with recurrent and persistent low back pain - a secondary analysis of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Impact of the MAINTAIN instrument on clinical decision-making for new spinal pain patients: a cross-sectional study.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2026Article
- Article
- Multi-Institutional Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Manual Maintenance Therapy for Chronic Bothersome Neck Pain.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Clinical indicators for recommending continued care to patients with neck pain in chiropractic practice: a cohort study.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2023Observational
- The nordic maintenance care program: patient experience of maintenance care-a qualitative study.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2021Article
- Chronic Progressive External Ophthalmoplegia and Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction: Balance, Gait, and Eye Movement Before and After Multimodal Chiropractic Care: A Case Study.Journal of chiropractic medicine · 2019Article
- Article
- On-Site Chiropractic Care as an Employee Benefit: A Single-Location Case Study.Journal of chiropractic medicine · 2017Article
- The chiropractic profession: a scoping review of utilization rates, reasons for seeking care, patient profiles, and care provided.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2017Article
- The Nordic maintenance care program: what is maintenance care? Interview based survey of Danish chiropractors.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2013Article
- The Nordic maintenance care program: the clinical use of identified indications for preventive care.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelled
backgroundBecause maintenance care (MC) is frequently used by chiropractors in the management of patients with back pain, it is necessary to define the rationale, frequency and indications for MC consultations, and the contents of such consultations. The objectives of the two studies described in this article are: i) to determine the typical spacing between visits for MC patients and to compare MC and non-MC patients, ii) to describe the content of the MC consultation and to compare MC and non-MC patients and iii) to investigate the purposes of the MC program.
methodIn two studies, chiropractors who accepted the MC paradigm were invited to assist with the data collection. In study 1, patients seen by seven different chiropractors were observed by two chiropractic students. They noted the contents of the observed consultations. In study 2, ten chiropractors invited their MC patients to participate in an anonymous survey. Participants filled in a one page questionnaire containing questions on their view of the purposes and contents of their MC consultations. In addition, information was obtained on the duration between appointments in both studies.
resultsThere were 178 valid records in study 1, and in study 2 the number of questionnaires received was 373. The time interval between MC visits was close to nine weeks and for non-MC consultations it was two weeks.The content of the consultations in study 1 was similar for MC and non-MC patients with treatment being the most time-consuming element followed by history taking/examination. MC consultations were slightly shorter than non-MC consultations.In study 2, the most common activities reported to have taken place were history taking and manipulative therapy. The most commonly reported purposes were to prevent recurring problems, to maintain best possible function and /or to stay as pain free as possible.
conclusionsThe results from these two studies indicate that MC consultations commonly take place with around two months intervals, and that history taking, examination and treatment are as important components in MC as in non-MC consultations. Further, the results demonstrate that most patients consider the goal to be secondary or tertiary prevention.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.