Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22883106›Full record

ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2012

Comparison of conventional and 3-dimensional computed tomography against histopathologic examination in determining pancreatic adenocarcinoma tumor size: implications for radiation therapy planning.

Haoming Qiu, Aaron T Wild, Hao Wang, Elliot K Fishman, Ralph H Hruban, Daniel A Laheru, Rachit Kumar, Amy Hacker-Prietz, Richard Tuli, Erik Tryggestad and 6 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Tumor Size Differences Between Preoperative Endoscopic Ultrasound and Postoperative Pathology for Neoadjuvant-Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Predict Patient Outcome.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Article
  3. PANCREATODUODENECTOMY IN PATIENT WITH VON HIPPEL-LINDAU DISEASE: A LITERATURE REVIEW.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia for treating locally advanced unresectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancers: the role of tumor size and eddy-current heating.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. External assessment of the Early Mortality Risk Score in patients with adenocarcinoma undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2015
    Article
  8. Baseline hemoglobin-A1c impacts clinical outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2014
    Article
  9. The role ofJournal of radiation oncology · 2013
    Article
  10. Recent progress in pancreatic cancer.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2013
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Haoming QiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Aaron T Wild
Hao Wang
Elliot K Fishman
Ralph H Hruban
Daniel A Laheru
Rachit Kumar
Amy Hacker-Prietz
Richard Tuli
Erik Tryggestad
Richard D Schulick
John L Cameron
Barish H Edil
Timothy M Pawlik
Christopher L Wolfgang
Joseph M Herman

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThis study seeks to: (a) quantify radiologic-pathologic discrepancy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma by comparing tumor size on conventional computed tomography (C-CT) and 3-dimensional CT (3D-CT) to corresponding pathologic specimens; and (b) to identify clinico-pathologic characteristics predictive of radiologic-pathologic discrepancy to assist radiotherapy planning. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty-three patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and preoperative C-CT and volume-rendered 3D-CT imaging within 6 weeks of resection were identified. Maximum tumor diameter (MTD) was measured on pathology, C-CT, and 3D-CT and compared for each patient as well as among different clinico-pathologic subgroups.

resultsThere was a trend toward C-CT underestimation of MTD compared to final pathology (p=0.08), but no significant difference between 3D-CT MTD and pathology (p=0.54). Pathologic tumor size was significantly underestimated by C-CT in patients with larger pathologic tumor size (>3.0 cm, p=0.0001), smaller tumor size on C-CT (<3.0 cm, p=0.003), higher CA19-9 (>90 U/mL, p=0.008), and location in the pancreatic head (p=0.015). A model for predicting pathologic MTD using C-CT MTD and CA19-9 level was generated.

conclusions3D-CT may allow for more accurate contouring of pancreatic tumors than C-CT. Patients with the above clinico-pathologic characteristics may require expanded margins relative to tumor size estimates on C-CT during radiotherapy planning.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalAdenocarcinomaAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID22883106
PMCPMC4124599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.