Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22882759›Full record

Trial reportBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2013

Increased doses of vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a randomised controlled double-blind multicentre trial.

V Serra, A Perales, J Meseguer, J J Parrilla, C Lara, J Bellver, R Grifol, I Alcover, M Sala, J C Martínez-Escoriza and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02329535 (Comparing a Double Dose of Vaginal Progesterone to no Treatment for the Prevention of Preterm Birth in Twins Pregnancy and Short Cervix), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02329535 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Comparing a Double Dose of Vaginal Progesterone to no Treatment for the Prevention of Preterm Birth in Twins Pregnancy and Short Cervix

TypeinterventionalSponsorHaEmek Medical Center, IsraelRan2015 to 2017Enrolled15ConditionsPremature BirthArmsMicronized progesterone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations with a short cervix: an updated individual patient data meta-analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a twin gestation and a short cervix: an updated meta-analysis of individual patient data.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2017
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. 17-Hydroxyprogesterone caproate in triplet pregnancy: an individual patient data meta-analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2016
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V SerraInstituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain. vicente.serra-serra@uv.es
A Perales
J Meseguer
J J Parrilla
C Lara
J Bellver
R Grifol
I Alcover
M Sala
J C Martínez-Escoriza
A Pellicer
Universitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrevious trials have shown little benefit for preventing preterm birth in twin pregnancies using 90-200 mg of daily vaginal natural progesterone. Higher doses have not been tested. Our aim was to determine the efficacy and safety of two different daily doses of vaginal natural progesterone (200 and 400 mg), compared with placebo, for preventing preterm birth in unselected twin pregnancies.

designRandomised controlled double-blind multicentre trial (1:1:1).

settingThe study was carried out in five university centres from Valencia, Murcia and Alicante (Spain). POPULATION: Women with dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies.

methodsThe women self-inserted two vaginal pessaries daily, containing placebo (n = 96), 200 mg of natural progesterone (n = 97) or 400 mg of natural progesterone (n = 97), from 20 to 34 weeks of gestation or delivery. Randomisation was performed by an external centre. Data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis.

main outcome measurePreterm birth rate.

resultsThe baseline characteristics for placebo and progesterone groups were similar. Comparison of the three groups and analysis of progesterone-treated versus untreated women showed similar pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. The proportion of preterm and very preterm births, low birthweight, perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity showed no differences between the three groups. Similar results were also obtained when comparing the 200- versus 400-mg progesterone groups. No serious adverse effects were encountered.

conclusionsVaginal progesterone therapy was generally well tolerated, but failed to prevent preterm births in unselected dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. The 400-mg progesterone dose offered no advantages over the 200-mg regimen.

Indexed as

Pregnancy, TwinAdministration, IntravaginalAdultBirth WeightDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMedication AdherencePessariesPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthProgesteroneProgestinsSelf CareProgesteroneProgestins

Identifiers

PMID22882759
OpenAlexW2157747855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.