ArticleClinical & experimental optometry2012
Positive impact of Australian 'blindness' tobacco warning labels: findings from the ITC four country survey.
Article in Clinical & experimental optometry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effectiveness of graphic health warnings on tobacco products: a systematic review on perceived harm and quit intentions.BMC public health · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of pictorial warning labels depicting lesser-known and well-known risks of smoking on viewing patterns, recall, and knowledge of smoking harms.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2023Trial
- Graphic Warning Labels Elicit Affective and Thoughtful Responses from Smokers: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.PloS one · 2015Trial
- Non-compliant packaging and illicit smokeless tobacco in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan: findings of a pack analysis.Tobacco control · 2024Article
- Adherence of patients with age-related macular degeneration to AREDS 2-recommended nutritional supplements.Irish journal of medical science · 2023Article
- Cigarette health warning label compliance in Nigeria: A multi-city observational study.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2023Article
- Impact of Pictorial Cigarette Warnings Compared With Surgeon General's Warnings on Understanding of the Negative Health Consequences of Smoking.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020Article
- Differences in smokers' awareness of the health risks of smoking before and after introducing pictorial tobacco health warnings: findings from the 2012-2017 international tobacco control (ITC) Netherlands surveys.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Quasi-experimentally examining the impact of introducing tobacco pictorial health warnings: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) 4C and Netherlands surveys in the Netherlands, Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, and the United States.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2020Article
- Impact of adding and removing warning label messages from cigarette packages on adult smokers' awareness about the health harms of smoking: findings from the ITC Canada Survey.Tobacco control · 2019Article
- Pictorial Warning Labels and Memory for Cigarette Health-risk Information Over Time.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2019Article
- Did the introduction of pictorial health warnings increase information seeking for smoking cessation?: Time-series analysis of Google Trends data in six countries.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2019Article
- Cadmium and lead exposure and risk of cataract surgery in U.S. adults.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2016Article
- Emotion in the Law and the Lab: The Case of Graphic Cigarette Warnings.Tobacco regulatory science · 2016Article
- Using eye-tracking to examine how embedding risk corrective statements improves cigarette risk beliefs: Implications for tobacco regulatory policy.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2016Article
- Educating smokers about the risk of blindness - insights to improve tobacco product health warning labels.Tobacco induced diseases · 2016Article
- The U.S. National Tips From Former Smokers Antismoking Campaign: Promoting Awareness of Smoking-Related Risks, Cessation Resources, and Cessation Behaviors.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2015Article
- Pictorial cigarette pack warnings have important effects.American journal of public health · 2015Article
- Pictorial health warning label content and smokers' understanding of smoking-related risks-a cross-country comparison.Health education research · 2015Article
- Smoking, antioxidant supplementation and dietary intakes among older adults with age-related macular degeneration over 10 years.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSmokers with greater knowledge of the health effects of smoking are more likely to quit and remain abstinent. Australia has communicated the causal association of smoking and blindness since the late 1990s. In March 2007, Australia became the first country to include a pictorial warning label on cigarette packages with the message that smoking causes blindness. The current study tested the hypothesis that the introduction of this warning label increased smokers' knowledge of this important health effect.
methodsSix waves of the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey were conducted, as a telephone survey of 17,472 adult smokers in Australia, Canada, United Kingdom and the United States, with three waves before and three waves after the blindness health warning was introduced in Australia. The survey measured adult smokers' knowledge that smoking causes blindness.
resultsAustralian smokers were significantly more likely to report that smoking causes blindness, compared to Canadian, UK and US smokers, where there were neither health campaigns nor health warnings labels about blindness. After the introduction of the blindness warning, Australian smokers were more likely than before the blindness warning to report that they know that smoking causes blindness (62 versus 49 per cent; OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.03, 2.76, p = 0.04). In Australia, smokers aged over 55 years were less likely than those aged 18 to 24 to report that smoking causes blindness (OR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.62, p < 0.001).
conclusionWhile more smokers report that smoking causes blindness in Australia compared to other countries, which have not had national social marketing campaigns, further gains in knowledge were found after pictorial warning labels were introduced in Australia. Findings suggest there is still a need to educate the public about the causal association of smoking and blindness. More education may be needed to redress the knowledge gap in older Australian smokers as the incidence of age-related macular degeneration increases with age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.