SynthesisBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2013
Incidence and risk of hypertension with vandetanib in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Synthesis in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Balancing the Risk-Benefit Ratio of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor and Anti-VEGF Combination Therapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Aromatase inhibitors and risk of cardiovascular events in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2019Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of the risks of hypertension and QTc prolongation in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who were receiving vandetanib.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Pooled it
- Congestive heart failure risk in cancer patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 clinical trials.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Pooled it
- Treatment-related mortality with aflibercept in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Pooled it
- Risk of hypertension in cancer patients treated with aflibercept: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical drug investigation · 2014Pooled it
- Risk of hypertension with regorafenib in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Incidence and risk of hypertension with a novel multi-targeted kinase inhibitor axitinib in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013Pooled it
- Incidence and risk of treatment-related mortality with mTOR inhibitors everolimus and temsirolimus in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- A Phase II Trial of Vandetanib in Children and Adults with Succinate Dehydrogenase-Deficient Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019Trial
- Cancer and Hypertension: Shared Mechanisms, Treatment Interactions, and Clinical Management.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- The double-edged sword of tumor-targeted treatment: the influence of targeted therapy on the heart.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Cardiotoxicity of small-molecule kinase inhibitors in cancer therapy.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- Hypertension toxicity of VEGFR-TKIs in cancer treatment: incidence, mechanisms, and management strategies.Archives of toxicology · 2025Review
- Nephrotoxicity associated with anticancer agents: perspective on onconephrology from nephrologists.International journal of clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Established and Emerging Cancer Therapies and Cardiovascular System: Focus on Hypertension-Mechanisms and Mitigation.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2023Review
- Risks and management of hypertension in cancer patients undergoing targeted therapy: a review.Clinical hypertension · 2022Review
- Multimodality Advanced Cardiovascular and Molecular Imaging for Early Detection and Monitoring of Cancer Therapy-Associated Cardiotoxicity and the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Nursing Management and Adverse Events in Thyroid Cancer Treatments with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical trials to determine incidence rate and overall risk of hypertension with vandetanib in cancer patients.
methodsA comprehensive literature search for studies published up to March 2012 was performed. Summary incidence rates, relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials.
resultsA total of 11 trials with 3154 patients were included for the meta-analysis. The summary incidences of all-grade and high-grade hypertension in patients with cancer were 24.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.1-30.2%] and 6.4% (95% CI, 3.3-9.5%), respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the pooled incidences of all-grade and high-grade hypertension were 21.8% [95% CI, 15-30.5%] and 7.6% (95% CI, 2.8-18.8%), respectively, among non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, and 32.1% (95% CI: 27.3-37.3%) and 8.8% (5.9%-12.9%), respectively, among MTC patients, and 15.4 (95% CI: 3.2-33.7%) and 3.4% (95% CI: 1%-11.1%) respectively, among non-MTC/NSCLC tumors patients. Furthermore, vandetanib was associated with a significant increased risk of all-grade hypertension (RR 5.1, 95% CI: 3.76-6.92, P = 0.000) and high-grade hypertension (RR 8.06, 95% CI: 3.41-19.04, P = 0.000) in comparison with controls.
conclusionsThere is a significant risk of developing hypertension in cancer patients receiving vandetanib. Appropriate monitoring and treatment is strongly recommended to prevent cardiovascular complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.