Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22881703›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2012

Tip-enhanced Raman detection of antibody conjugated nanoparticles on cellular membranes.

Kristen D Alexander, Zachary D Schultz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Probing Membrane Receptors with Enhanced Raman Imaging.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Experimental correlation of electric fields and Raman signals in SERS and TERS.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristen D AlexanderUniversity of Notre Dame, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Zachary D Schultz

Funding

Nanoscale Biomembrane Characterization: Model Systems to CellsR00RR024367 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI SCHULTZ, ZACHARY · 2009 to 2011
$736k
NCRR NIH HHS R00 RR024367NCRR NIH HHS R00RR024367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tip enhanced Raman scattering (TERS) microscopy is used to image antibody conjugated nanoparticles on intact cellular membranes. The combination of plasmonic coupling and the resultant electric field obtained from intermediate focusing of a radially polarized source gives rise to Raman images with spatial resolution below 50 nm. Finite element method calculations are used to explain the origins of the observed image resolution and spectroscopic signals. The observed Raman scattering provides information about the biomolecules present near the nanoparticle probes. The results show that aggregates of nanoparticles produce spectroscopic results similar to those reported from other surface enhanced Raman spectroscopies, e.g., shell isolated nanoparticle enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SHINERS) and aggregated nanoparticles; however, TERS enables the detection of isolated nanoparticles on cell membranes where the observed spectra provide information about the interaction of the specific biomolecule conjugated to the nanoparticle probe. These measurements present a new technique for exploring biomolecular interactions on the surface of cells and tissue.

Indexed as

Microscopy, Atomic ForceSpectrum Analysis, RamanAntibodiesCell MembraneGoldMetal NanoparticlesNanoparticlesSurface Plasmon ResonanceAntibodiesGold

Identifiers

PMID22881703
PMCPMC3449091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.