Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22879926›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Prognostic impact of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in relation to CD8+ T lymphocyte density in human colon carcinomas.

Harry H Yoon, Jared M Orrock, Nathan R Foster, Daniel J Sargent, Thomas C Smyrk, Frank A Sinicrope

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Harry H YoonDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Jared M Orrock
Nathan R Foster
Daniel J Sargent
Thomas C Smyrk
Frank A Sinicrope
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USWinnMed · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHU10CA025224 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BUCKNER, JAN C · 1985 to 2013
$85.0M
Translational Research in Colon Cancer Prevention & TreatmentK05CA142885 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SINICROPE, FRANK A. · 2009 to 2013
$808k
NCI NIH HHS CA25224-32CMNCI NIH HHS K05 CA142885NCI NIH HHS K05CA-142885NCI NIH HHS U10 CA025224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundT-lymphocyte infiltration into colon carcinomas can influence clinical outcome, and interactions among T cell subsets may be more informative than either subset alone. Our objective was to examine the prognostic impact of tumor-infiltrating FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) in relation to cytotoxic CD8(+) T lymphocytes in patients with colon carcinomas characterized by DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status who participated in adjuvant chemotherapy trials.

methodsFoxP3(+) and CD8(+) densities in tumor epithelial and stromal compartments were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and quantified in resected, stage II and III colonic carcinomas (N = 216). Immune marker density was dichotomized at the median and categorized as high vs low. MMR status was classified as MMR deficient (dMMR) or proficient (pMMR). Cox models were adjusted for age, stage, and tumor grade.

resultsThe density of FoxP3+ infiltration was similar in tumor stroma and epithelia, whereas CD8+ was higher in stroma. The prognostic impact of FoxP3+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration was stronger in stroma vs epithelia, and the density of each marker in stroma was independently associated with improved overall survival (OS). However, the impact of FoxP3+ on survival was dependent upon CD8+ density (P interaction = 040). Among CD8+(low) tumors, FoxP3+(high) cases had significantly improved OS compared to FoxP3+(low) cases after adjustment for covariates (hazard ratio 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.19 to 0.95; P = .030). In contrast, FoxP3+ was not prognostic among CD8+(high) tumors. FoxP3+ remained prognostic in CD8+(low) tumors after further adjustment for MMR or BRAF(V600E) mutation status. Additionally, these immune markers identified a pMMR subgroup with a similarly favorable OS as for dMMR tumors.

conclusionsThe prognostic impact of FoxP3+ and CD8+ T cell density are inter-dependent, whereby FoxP3+ exerts a favorable influence on survival only in colon cancers with low CD8+ infiltration.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell MovementColonic NeoplasmsDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleForkhead Transcription FactorsHumansLymphocyte CountMaleMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival AnalysisT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryBiomarkersForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXP3 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22879926
PMCPMC3412852
OpenAlexW2071199505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.