Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22879907›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

SNP discovery using Next Generation Transcriptomic Sequencing in Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus).

Sarah J Helyar, Morten T Limborg, Dorte Bekkevold, Massimiliano Babbucci, Jeroen van Houdt, Gregory E Maes, Luca Bargelloni, Rasmus O Nielsen, Martin I Taylor, Rob Ogden and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genetic Characterization of the FishFrontiers in genetics · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. SNP Discovery from Transcriptome of Cashmere Goat Skin.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Sarah J HelyarMolecular Ecology and Fisheries Genetics Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom. sarah.helyar@matis.is
Morten T Limborg
Dorte Bekkevold
Massimiliano Babbucci
Jeroen van Houdt
Gregory E Maes
Luca Bargelloni
Rasmus O Nielsen
Martin I Taylor
Rob Ogden
Alessia Cariani
Gary R Carvalho
FishPopTrace Consortium
Frank Panitz
Bangor University · GBKU Leuven · BETechnical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Padua · ITAarhus University · DKRoyal Zoological Society of Scotland · GBUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has revolutionised population genetics, providing studies of non-model species with unprecedented genomic coverage, allowing evolutionary biologists to address questions previously far beyond the reach of available resources. Furthermore, the simple mutation model of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) permits cost-effective high-throughput genotyping in thousands of individuals simultaneously. Genomic resources are scarce for the Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus), a small pelagic species that sustains high revenue fisheries. This paper details the development of 578 SNPs using a combined NGS and high-throughput genotyping approach. Eight individuals covering the species distribution in the eastern Atlantic were bar-coded and multiplexed into a single cDNA library and sequenced using the 454 GS FLX platform. SNP discovery was performed by de novo sequence clustering and contig assembly, followed by the mapping of reads against consensus contig sequences. Selection of candidate SNPs for genotyping was conducted using an in silico approach. SNP validation and genotyping were performed simultaneously using an Illumina 1,536 GoldenGate assay. Although the conversion rate of candidate SNPs in the genotyping assay cannot be predicted in advance, this approach has the potential to maximise cost and time efficiencies by avoiding expensive and time-consuming laboratory stages of SNP validation. Additionally, the in silico approach leads to lower ascertainment bias in the resulting SNP panel as marker selection is based only on the ability to design primers and the predicted presence of intron-exon boundaries. Consequently SNPs with a wider spectrum of minor allele frequencies (MAFs) will be genotyped in the final panel. The genomic resources presented here represent a valuable multi-purpose resource for developing informative marker panels for population discrimination, microarray development and for population genomic studies in the wild.

Indexed as

AnimalsAtlantic OceanBase SequenceFishesGene FrequencyGenetic Association StudiesGenotyping TechniquesGeographyMicrosatellite RepeatsMolecular Sequence AnnotationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsRNA, MessengerSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityTranscriptomeRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID22879907
PMCPMC3413699
OpenAlexW1972852715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.