Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22879821›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2012

A general G1/S-phase cell-cycle control module in the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana.

Xin'Ai Zhao, Hirofumi Harashima, Nico Dissmeyer, Stefan Pusch, Annika K Weimer, Jonathan Bramsiepe, Daniel Bouyer, Svenja Rademacher, Moritz K Nowack, Bela Novak and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Connections between the Cell Cycle and the DNA Damage Response in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Xin'Ai ZhaoDepartment of Molecular Mechanisms of Phenotypic Plasticity, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Hirofumi Harashima
Nico Dissmeyer
Stefan Pusch
Annika K Weimer
Jonathan Bramsiepe
Daniel Bouyer
Svenja Rademacher
Moritz K Nowack
Bela Novak
Stefanie Sprunck
Arp Schnittger
Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FRUniversity of Regensburg · DEInstitut National des Sciences Appliquées de Strasbourg · FRUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Oxford · GBVIB-UGent Center for Plant Systems Biology · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The decision to replicate its DNA is of crucial importance for every cell and, in many organisms, is decisive for the progression through the entire cell cycle. A comparison of animals versus yeast has shown that, although most of the involved cell-cycle regulators are divergent in both clades, they fulfill a similar role and the overall network topology of G1/S regulation is highly conserved. Using germline development as a model system, we identified a regulatory cascade controlling entry into S phase in the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana, which, as a member of the Plantae supergroup, is phylogenetically only distantly related to Opisthokonts such as yeast and animals. This module comprises the Arabidopsis homologs of the animal transcription factor E2F, the plant homolog of the animal transcriptional repressor Retinoblastoma (Rb)-related 1 (RBR1), the plant-specific F-box protein F-BOX-LIKE 17 (FBL17), the plant specific cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors KRPs, as well as CDKA;1, the plant homolog of the yeast and animal Cdc2⁺/Cdk1 kinases. Our data show that the principle of a double negative wiring of Rb proteins is highly conserved, likely representing a universal mechanism in eukaryotic cell-cycle control. However, this negative feedback of Rb proteins is differently implemented in plants as it is brought about through a quadruple negative regulation centered around the F-box protein FBL17 that mediates the degradation of CDK inhibitors but is itself directly repressed by Rb. Biomathematical simulations and subsequent experimental confirmation of computational predictions revealed that this regulatory circuit can give rise to hysteresis highlighting the here identified dosage sensitivity of CDK inhibitors in this network.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantAnimalsArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCDC2 Protein KinaseComputer SimulationCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor ProteinsCyclin-Dependent KinasesE2F4 Transcription FactorF-Box ProteinsFlowersG1 PhaseGene Regulatory NetworksModels, BiologicalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeS PhaseArabidopsis ProteinsAT3G54650 protein, ArabidopsisCDC2 Protein KinaseCDKA1 protein, ArabidopsisCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor ProteinsCyclin-Dependent KinasesE2F4 Transcription FactorF-Box ProteinsRBR1 protein, Arabidopsis

Identifiers

PMID22879821
PMCPMC3410867
OpenAlexW2062030742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.