ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2013
Angioneural crosstalk in scaffolds with oriented microchannels for regenerative spinal cord injury repair.
Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human Cell-Derived Matrix Composite Hydrogels with Diverse Composition for Use in Vasculature-on-chip Models.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Sustained release of hydrogen sulfide from anisotropic ferrofluid hydrogel for the repair of spinal cord injury.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Harnessing neurovascular interaction to guide axon growth.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Degradation of the electrospun silica nanofiber in a biological medium for primary hippocampal neuron - effect of surface modification.International journal of nanomedicine · 2016Article
- Bridging the lesion-engineering a permissive substrate for nerve regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2015Article
- PHBV/PAM scaffolds with local oriented structure through UV polymerization for tissue engineering.BioMed research international · 2014Article
- Enhanced survival and neurite network formation of human umbilical cord blood neuronal progenitors in three-dimensional collagen constructs.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of our work is to utilize the crosstalk between the vascular and the neuronal system to enhance directed neuritogenesis in uniaxial guidance scaffolds for the repair of spinal cord injury. In this study, we describe a method for angioneural regenerative engineering, i.e., for generating biodegradable scaffolds, produced by a combination of controlled freezing (freeze-casting) and lyophilization, which contain longitudinally oriented channels, and provide uniaxial directionality to support and guide neuritogenesis from neuronal cells in the presence of endothelial cells. The optimized scaffolds, composed of 2.5 % gelatin and 1 % genipin crosslinked, were characterized by an elastic modulus of ~51 kPa and longitudinal channels of ~50 μm diameter. The scaffolds support the growth of endothelial cells, undifferentiated or NGF-differentiated PC12 cells, and primary cultures of fetal chick forebrain neurons. The angioneural crosstalk, as generated by first forming endothelial cell monolayers in the scaffolds followed by injection of neuronal cells, leads to the outgrowth of long aligned neurites in the PC12/endothelial cell co-cultures also in the absence of exogenously added nerve growth factor. Neuritogenesis was not observed in the scaffolds in the absence of the endothelial cells. This methodology is a promising approach for neural tissue engineering and may be applicable for regenerative spinal cord injury repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.