ArticleJournal of neural engineering2012
Signal distortion from microelectrodes in clinical EEG acquisition systems.
Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microelectrode arrays enable directional stereo-EEG during kainate-mediated seizures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Using a wearable EEG device to examine age trends in sleep macro- and micro-architecture across adolescence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Tuning Microelectrodes' Impedance to Improve Fast Ripples Recording.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Miniaturization for wearable EEG systems: recording hardware and data processing.Biomedical engineering letters · 2022Review
- Flexible, high-resolution thin-film electrodes for human and animal neural research.Journal of neural engineering · 2021Article
- Generation of Monophasic Action Potentials and Intermediate Forms.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Quantitative simulation of extracellular single unit recording from the surface of cortex.Journal of neural engineering · 2018Article
- Effect of Reference Scheme on Power and Phase of the Local Field Potential.Neural computation · 2016Article
- On the nature of seizure dynamics.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2014Article
- Article
- Theoretical analysis of the local field potential in deep brain stimulation applications.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many centers are now using high-density microelectrodes during traditional intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) both for research and clinical purposes. These microelectrodes are FDA-approved and integrate into clinical EEG acquisition systems. However, the electrical characteristics of these electrodes are poorly described and clinical systems were not designed to use them; thus, it is possible that this shift into clinical practice could have unintended consequences. In this study, we characterized the impedance of over 100 commercial macro- and microelectrodes using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to determine how electrode properties could affect signal acquisition and interpretation. The EIS data were combined with the published specifications of several commercial EEG systems to design digital filters that mimic the behavior of the electrodes and amplifiers. These filters were used to analyze simulated brain signals that contain a mixture of characteristic features commonly observed in iEEG. Each output was then processed with several common quantitative EEG measurements. Our results show that traditional macroelectrodes had low impedances and produced negligible distortion of the original signal. Brain tissue and electrical wiring also had negligible filtering effects. However, microelectrode impedances were much higher and more variable than the macroelectrodes. When connected to clinical amplifiers, higher impedance electrodes produced considerable distortion of the signal at low frequencies (<60 Hz), which caused significant changes in amplitude, phase, variance and spectral band power. In contrast, there were only minimal changes to the signal content for frequencies above 100 Hz. In order to minimize distortion with microelectrodes, we determined that an acquisition system should have an input impedance of at least 1 GΩ, which is much higher than most clinical systems. These results show that it is critical to account for variations in impedance when analyzing EEG from different-sized electrodes. Data from microelectrodes may yield misleading results unless recorded with high-impedance amplifiers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.