Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22878582›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2012

[Treatment of periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures : modern plate osteosynthesis procedures].

M J Raschke, R Stange, C Kösters

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. [Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum: osteosynthesis].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

M J RaschkeKlinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Deutschland. Michael.Raschke@ukmuenster.de
R Stange
C Kösters
Klinik für Schlafmedizin · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periprosthetic fractures are increasing not only due to the demographic development with high life expectancy, the increase in osteoporosis and increased prosthesis implantation but also due to increased activity of the elderly population. The therapeutic algorithms are manifold but general valid rules for severe fractures are not available. The most commonly occurring periprosthetic fractures are proximal and distal femoral fractures but in the clinical routine fractures of the tibial head, ankle, shoulder, elbow and on the borders to other implants (peri-implant fractures) and complex interprosthetic fractures are being seen increasingly more. It is to be expected that in the mid-term further options, such as cement augmentation of cannulated polyaxial locking screws will extend the portfolio of implants for treatment of periprosthetic fractures. The aim of this review article is to present the new procedures for osteosynthesis of periprosthetic fractures.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesAlgorithmsBone CementsBone ScrewsEquipment DesignFemoral FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalFracture HealingHip FracturesHip ProsthesisHumansHumeral FracturesJoint ProsthesisMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresOsteoporotic FracturesPeriprosthetic FracturesBone Cements

Identifiers

PMID22878582
OpenAlexW1483396878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.