Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22878507›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2013

Incidental copy-number variants identified by routine genome testing in a clinical population.

Philip M Boone, Zachry T Soens, Ian M Campbell, Pawel Stankiewicz, Sau Wai Cheung, Ankita Patel, Arthur L Beaudet, Sharon E Plon, Chad A Shaw, Amy L McGuire and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Ethics in genetic counselling.Journal of community genetics · 2019
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Philip M BooneDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Zachry T Soens
Ian M Campbell
Pawel Stankiewicz
Sau Wai Cheung
Ankita Patel
Arthur L Beaudet
Sharon E Plon
Chad A Shaw
Amy L McGuire
James R Lupski

Funding

The Human Genome Sequencing CenterU54HG003273 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GIBBS, RICHARD A · 2004 to 2015
$341.3M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007330 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PLON, SHARON E. · 1985 to 2019
$15.6M
Baylor-Johns Hopkins Center for Mendelian GeneticsU54HG006542 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VALLE, DAVID · 2012 to 2015
$15.6M
Nonrecurrent rearrangements, genome architecture and neurodegenerative disease.R01NS058529 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LUPSKI, JAMES R. · 2009 to 2017
$5.0M
MOLECULAR GENETICS EMPHASIZING VISION RESEARCHT32EY007102 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MARDON, GRAEME · 1988 to 2019
$3.8M
Genomic Approaches to Defining Inherited Basis of Childhood CancerR01CA138836 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PLON, SHARON E. · 2010 to 2012
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138836NCI NIH HHS R01CA138836NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007102NEI NIH HHS T32EY007102NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG003273NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG006542NHGRI NIH HHS U54HG006542NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007330NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM007330NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS058529NINDS NIH HHS R01NS058529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMutational load of susceptibility variants has not been studied on a genomic scale in a clinical population, nor has the potential to identify these mutations as incidental findings during clinical testing been systematically ascertained.

methodsArray comparative genomic hybridization, a method for genome-wide detection of DNA copy-number variants, was performed clinically on DNA from 9,005 individuals. Copy-number variants encompassing or disrupting single genes were identified and analyzed for their potential to confer predisposition to dominant, adult-onset disease. Multigene copy-number variants affecting dominant, adult-onset cancer syndrome genes were also assessed.

resultsIn our cohort, 83 single-gene copy-number variants affected 40 unique genes associated with dominant, adult-onset disorders and unrelated to the patients' referring diagnoses (i.e., incidental) were found. Fourteen of these copy-number variants are likely disease-predisposing, 25 are likely benign, and 44 are of unknown clinical consequence. When incidental copy-number variants spanning up to 20 genes were considered, 27 copy-number variants affected 17 unique genes associated with dominant, adult-onset cancer predisposition.

conclusionCopy-number variants potentially conferring susceptibility to adult-onset disease can be identified as incidental findings during routine genome-wide testing. Some of these mutations may be medically actionable, enabling disease surveillance or prevention; however, most incidentally observed single-gene copy-number variants are currently of unclear significance to the patient.

Indexed as

Comparative Genomic HybridizationDNA Copy Number VariationsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAge of OnsetBase SequenceChromosome MappingFemaleGene OrderHumansInheritance PatternsMaleReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID22878507
PMCPMC3705759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.