Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22878372›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2012

Safety, cost-effectiveness and feasibility of daycase paracentesis in the management of malignant ascites with a focus on ovarian cancer.

V Harding, E Fenu, H Medani, R Shaboodien, S Ngan, H K Li, R Burt, N Diamantis, M Tuthill, S Blagden and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Management of drainage for malignant ascites in gynaecological cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Determination of the optimal volume of ascitic fluid for the precise diagnosis of malignant ascites.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Trial
  3. Diagnostic and therapeutic abdominal paracentesis.The Medical journal of Australia · 2023
    Article
  4. An Academic Hospitalist-Run Outpatient Paracentesis Clinic.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A survey of treatment approaches of malignant ascites in Germany and Austria.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

V HardingDepartment of Oncology, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
E Fenu
H Medani
R Shaboodien
S Ngan
H K Li
R Burt
N Diamantis
M Tuthill
S Blagden
H Gabra
C E Urch
S Moser
R Agarwal
Hammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBRoyal College of Physicians · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParacentesis for malignant ascites is usually performed as an in-patient procedure, with a median length of stay (LoS) of 3-5 days, with intermittent clamping of the drain due to a perceived risk of hypotension. In this study, we assessed the safety of free drainage and the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of daycase paracentesis.

methodOvarian cancer admissions at Hammersmith Hospital between July and October 2009 were audited (Stage 1). A total of 21 patients (Stage 2) subsequently underwent paracentesis with free drainage of ascites without intermittent clamping (October 2010-January 2011). Finally, 13 patients (19 paracenteses, Stage 3), were drained as a daycase (May-December 2011).

resultsOf 67 patients (Stage 1), 22% of admissions and 18% of bed-days were for paracentesis, with a median LoS of 4 days. In all, 81% of patients (Stage 2) drained completely without hypotension. Of four patients with hypotension, none was tachycardic or symptomatic. Daycase paracentesis achieved complete ascites drainage without complications, or the need for in-patient admission in 94.7% of cases (Stage 3), and cost £954 compared with £1473 for in-patient drainage.

conclusionsFree drainage of malignant ascites is safe. Daycase paracentesis is feasible, cost-effective and reduces hospital admissions, and potentially represents the standard of care for patients with malignant ascites.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedAscitesCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease ManagementFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayLondonMedical RecordsMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPalliative CareParacentesis

Identifiers

PMID22878372
PMCPMC3464770
OpenAlexW2085204956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.