ArticlePLoS computational biology2012
Mutation induced extinction in finite populations: lethal mutagenesis and lethal isolation.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking planetary protection: an island biogeographical analysis.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Inferring the distribution of fitness effects in patient-sampled and experimental virus populations: two case studies.Heredity · 2022Article
- Imposed mutational meltdown as an antiviral strategy.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2020Review
- Noise-induced bistability in the fate of cancer phenotypic quasispecies: a bit-strings approach.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Abrupt transitions to tumor extinction: a phenotypic quasispecies model.Journal of mathematical biology · 2017Article
- Two sides of the same coin: A population genetics perspective on lethal mutagenesis and mutational meltdown.Virus evolution · 2017Article
- Causes of evolutionary rate variation among protein sites.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2016Review
- Merging molecular mechanism and evolution: theory and computation at the interface of biophysics and evolutionary population genetics.Current opinion in structural biology · 2014Review
- Variability in mutational fitness effects prevents full lethal transitions in large quasispecies populations.Scientific reports · 2014Article
- Extinction of hepatitis C virus by ribavirin in hepatoma cells involves lethal mutagenesis.PloS one · 2013Article
- Distinct groups of repetitive families preserved in mammals correspond to different periods of regulatory innovations in vertebrates.Biology direct · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reproduction is inherently risky, in part because genomic replication can introduce new mutations that are usually deleterious toward fitness. This risk is especially severe for organisms whose genomes replicate "semi-conservatively," e.g. viruses and bacteria, where no master copy of the genome is preserved. Lethal mutagenesis refers to extinction of populations due to an unbearably high mutation rate (U), and is important both theoretically and clinically, where drugs can extinguish pathogens by increasing their mutation rate. Previous theoretical models of lethal mutagenesis assume infinite population size (N). However, in addition to high U, small N can accelerate extinction by strengthening genetic drift and relaxing selection. Here, we examine how the time until extinction depends jointly on N and U. We first analytically compute the mean time until extinction (τ) in a simplistic model where all mutations are either lethal or neutral. The solution motivates the definition of two distinct regimes: a survival phase and an extinction phase, which differ dramatically in both how τ scales with N and in the coefficient of variation in time until extinction. Next, we perform stochastic population-genetics simulations on a realistic fitness landscape that both (i) features an epistatic distribution of fitness effects that agrees with experimental data on viruses and (ii) is based on the biophysics of protein folding. More specifically, we assume that mutations inflict fitness penalties proportional to the extent that they unfold proteins. We find that decreasing N can cause phase transition-like behavior from survival to extinction, which motivates the concept of "lethal isolation." Furthermore, we find that lethal mutagenesis and lethal isolation interact synergistically, which may have clinical implications for treating infections. Broadly, we conclude that stably folded proteins are only possible in ecological settings that support sufficiently large populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.