ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2012
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the differentiation of type 1 and type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- European Guideline on IgG4-related digestive disease - UEG and SGF evidence-based recommendations.United European gastroenterology journal · 2020Guideline
- Pooled it
- Comparison of 19-gauge aspiration needles versus 20-gauge forward-bevel needles for diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis: a single-centre randomised controlled trial.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Trial
- Mass-forming type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis with upstream dilatation of the main pancreatic duct dilatation: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2024Article
- Can serum immunoglobulin G4 levels and age serve as reliable predictors of relapse in autoimmune pancreatitis?World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Biopsy for Histological Diagnosis of Type 2 Autoimmune Pancreatitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Current status of type 1 (IgG4-related) autoimmune pancreatitis.Journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Biopsy diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: Does it bring a conclusion or confusion?DEN open · 2022Review
- Concordance of the histological diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis and its distinction from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy specimens: an interobserver agreement study.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022Article
- Histological features of autoimmune pancreatitis and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis with a correlation with imaging findings.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2021Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for the histopathological diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2021Review
- The Role of EUS-Guided FNA and FNB in Autoimmune Pancreatitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Late-onset type-2 autoimmune pancreatitis with two mass lesions diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- The role of apparent diffusion coefficient value in the diagnosis of localized type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: differentiation from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and evaluation of response to steroids.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Article
- Utility of a 21-gauge Menghini-type biopsy needle with the rolling method for an endoscopic ultrasound-guided histological diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis: a retrospective study.BMC gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in autoimmune pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- The Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis Using Endoscopic Ultrasonography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- EUS-guided needle biopsy for autoimmune pancreatitis.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Can the wet suction technique change the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis type 1? A prospective single-arm study.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the usefulness of endoscopic ultra-sound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP).
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 47 of 56 AIP patients who underwent EUS-FNA and met the Asian diagnostic criteria. On 47 EUS-FNA specimens, we evaluated the presence of adequate material and characteristic features of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP) and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP) mentioned in the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria and examined if these findings make a contribution to the differential diagnosis of type 1 and type 2 AIP. A disposable 22-gauge needle was used for EUS-FNA.
resultsAdequate specimens including pancreatic tissue for differentiating AIP from cancer were obtained from 43 of 47 patients who underwent EUS-FNA. EUS-FNA was performed from the pancreatic head in 21 cases, which is known to be technically difficult when performed by core biopsy; there was no significant difference in the results compared with pancreatic body-tail. Nine of 47 patients met level 1 findings of LPSP and 5 patients met level 2 findings of LPSP. No one met level 1 findings of IDCP, but 3 patients met level 2 findings of IDCP. Of 10 seronegative cases, 2 cases were diagnosed with "definitive type 1 AIP", and 3 cases were diagnosed with "probable type 2 AIP" when considering both the level 2 histological findings and response to steroids.
conclusionEUS-FNA is useful in the differentiation of type 1 and type 2 AIP, particularly in seronegative cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.