Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22875897›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012

A PCR-based intergenic spacer region-capillary gel electrophoresis typing method for identification and subtyping of Nocardia species.

M C Wehrhahn, M Xiao, F Kong, Y-C Xu, S C-A Chen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Access microbiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M C WehrhahnCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory Services, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, NSW, Australia. mcwehrhahn@hotmail.com
M Xiao
F Kong
Y-C Xu
S C-A Chen
Westmead Hospital · AUChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While 16S rRNA sequence-based identification of Nocardia species has become the gold standard, it is not without its limitations. We evaluated a novel approach encompassing the amplification of the Nocardia 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer (IGS) region followed by fragment analysis by capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE) of the amplified product for species identification of Nocardia. One hundred forty-five Nocardia isolates (19 species) and four non-Nocardia aerobic actinomycetes were studied. Reproducibility testing was performed in a subset (21%) of isolates. Ninety-five different electropherograms were identified, with heterogeneity within species being a general observation. Among common Nocardia species (e.g., Nocardia cyriacigeorgica, N. nova, N. farcinica), 2 or 3 dominant electropherogram subgroups were typical. While only a minority (8/19; 42%) of the different Nocardia species contained isolates displaying unique fragment sizes that were predictive of a particular species, virtually all isolates (142/145; 98%) could be assigned to the correct species using IGS-CGE typing based on the number and size of amplified fragments. The median number of fragments for each isolate was 2 (range, 1 to 5) with only a minority (17%) having a single fragment detected. The majority (93%) of amplified fragments were between 408 and 461 bp. The technique was also non-operator dependent, highly reproducible, and quicker and less expensive than 16S sequencing. In summary, PCR-based IGS-CGE typing is relatively simple, accurate, reproducible, and cost-effective and offers a potential alternative to 16S rRNA sequencing for identifying and subtyping Nocardia isolates.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisDNA, Ribosomal SpacerElectrophoresis, CapillaryHumansMolecular TypingNocardiaPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsDNA, Ribosomal Spacer

Identifiers

PMID22875897
PMCPMC3486202
OpenAlexW2111409448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.