ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012
A PCR-based intergenic spacer region-capillary gel electrophoresis typing method for identification and subtyping of Nocardia species.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using capillary electrophoresis to identify Anopheline species in routine sampling sites.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Merits and pitfalls of currently used diagnostic tools in mycetoma.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2014Review
- Article
- Characterization of the intergenic spacer rDNAs of two pig nodule worms, Oesophagostomum dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While 16S rRNA sequence-based identification of Nocardia species has become the gold standard, it is not without its limitations. We evaluated a novel approach encompassing the amplification of the Nocardia 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer (IGS) region followed by fragment analysis by capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE) of the amplified product for species identification of Nocardia. One hundred forty-five Nocardia isolates (19 species) and four non-Nocardia aerobic actinomycetes were studied. Reproducibility testing was performed in a subset (21%) of isolates. Ninety-five different electropherograms were identified, with heterogeneity within species being a general observation. Among common Nocardia species (e.g., Nocardia cyriacigeorgica, N. nova, N. farcinica), 2 or 3 dominant electropherogram subgroups were typical. While only a minority (8/19; 42%) of the different Nocardia species contained isolates displaying unique fragment sizes that were predictive of a particular species, virtually all isolates (142/145; 98%) could be assigned to the correct species using IGS-CGE typing based on the number and size of amplified fragments. The median number of fragments for each isolate was 2 (range, 1 to 5) with only a minority (17%) having a single fragment detected. The majority (93%) of amplified fragments were between 408 and 461 bp. The technique was also non-operator dependent, highly reproducible, and quicker and less expensive than 16S sequencing. In summary, PCR-based IGS-CGE typing is relatively simple, accurate, reproducible, and cost-effective and offers a potential alternative to 16S rRNA sequencing for identifying and subtyping Nocardia isolates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.