Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22875474›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastroenterology2013

NSAID enteropathy: could probiotics prevent it?

Massimo Montalto, Antonella Gallo, Antonio Gasbarrini, Raffaele Landolfi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. NSAID-Gut Microbiota Interactions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The influence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the gut microbiome.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Massimo MontaltoIstituto di Medicina Interna, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. mmontalto@rm.unicatt.it
Antonella Gallo
Antonio Gasbarrini
Raffaele Landolfi
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly used drugs in the world; nevertheless, about 50-70% of patients on long-term NSAIDs develop small intestine injury, namely NSAID enteropathy, sometimes with serious outcomes. No medications with proven efficacy are yet available to prevent NSAID enteropathy. A series of therapeutic strategies targeting the different mechanisms involved in small bowel injury have been investigated, but without definitive results. Intestinal bacteria and their degradation products are essential for the development of NSAID-induced small bowel lesions, because "germ-free" animals were found to be resistant to indomethacin injuries. Therefore, it has been suggested that modulating the intestinal flora, for example by using probiotics, could protect against NSAID enteropathy. In this work, we reviewed the main therapeutic strategies for NSAID enteropathy, in particular analyzing the available studies relating to the eventual protective role of probiotics. We found that results are not all concordant; nevertheless, the more recent studies provide better understanding about pathogenetic mechanisms involved in small intestinal injury and the role of probiotics, and show encouraging results. Larger and well-designed studies should be performed to evaluate the actual role of probiotics in NSAID enteropathy, the eventual differences among probiotic strains, dose-responses, and optimal duration of therapy.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalHumansIntestinal DiseasesProbioticsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

PMID22875474
OpenAlexW2018020068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.