Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22875414›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2013

Ovarian cancer surgery: health and coping during the perioperative period.

Lene Seibaek, Jan Blaakaer, Lone Kjeld Petersen, Lise Hounsgaard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Coping strategies, trajectories, and their associations with patient-reported outcomes among women with ovarian cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lene SeibaekDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. leneseib@rm.dk
Jan Blaakaer
Lone Kjeld Petersen
Lise Hounsgaard
Aarhus University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study objective was to survey general health and coping in women undergoing ovarian cancer surgery, and subsequently to develop and test a supportive care intervention. METHODS/MATERIALS: Women who underwent surgery on the suspicion of ovarian cancer participated in a follow-up questionnaire study in which the Short Form-36 Questionnaire was used to survey general health twice during the perioperative period and the Life Orientation Questionnaire (SOC) was used once to define the postoperative coping capacity. An evidence-based, preoperative supportive care programme was subsequently developed and tested. This consisted of lean methodology applied to clinical pathways, preoperative optimisation, and psychosocial care and support.

resultsFrom 294 women allocated to three study groups, a total of 546 Short Form-36 questionnaires and 253 SOC questionnaires were available for analysis. The overall response rate was 86 %. The presence of ascites, a pelvic mass, and a Risk of Malignancy Index >200 proved to be appropriate clinical markers for intensified preoperative care. Concerning physical health, levels were low throughout the perioperative period; the majority however stayed within standard levels. Concerning mental health, levels were below standard during the entire period, but did improve with time, also in women in whom the potential cancer diagnosis was refuted. The preoperative differences between these groups leveled out postoperatively in terms of physical health. At the end of the perioperative period, the coping capacity was close to normal.

conclusionsA need for supportive care during the perioperative period was identified. This should be adjusted to the nature of the disease and the extent of the treatment. Participation in a preoperative supportive programme supported physical health during the perioperative period; however, further support of mental health seemed required.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalSocial SupportCritical PathwaysDenmarkEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth StatusHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPerioperative PeriodPreoperative CareProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID22875414
OpenAlexW2144395052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.