Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22874423›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2012

CCK-8 and CCK-58 differ in their effects on nocturnal solid meal pattern in undisturbed rats.

Miriam Goebel-Stengel, Andreas Stengel, Lixin Wang, Gordon Ohning, Yvette Taché, Joseph R Reeve

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Nesfatin-1Nutrients · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cholecystokinin and pancreatic cancer: the chicken or the egg?American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miriam Goebel-StengelCURE: Digestive Diseases Research Center, Digestive Diseases Division, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles 90073, USA.
Andreas Stengel
Lixin Wang
Gordon Ohning
Yvette Taché
Joseph R Reeve
University of California, Los Angeles · USBrentwood Biomedical Research Institute · US

Funding

Pilot and Feasibility ProgramP30DK041301 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ROZENGURT, JUAN ENRIQUE · 1990 to 2019
$18.0M
Cholecystokinin is a Physiological Regulator of Intermeal IntervalR01DK083449 · NIDDK · BRENTWOOD BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REEVE, JOSEPH R · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK-41301NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK041301NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK-083449NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK083449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various molecular forms of CCK reduce food intake in rats. Although CCK-8 is the most studied form, we reported that CCK-58 is the only detectable endocrine peptide form in rats. We investigated the dark-phase rat chow intake pattern following injection of CCK-8 and CCK-58. Ad libitum-fed male Sprague-Dawley rats were intraperitoneally injected with CCK-8, CCK-58 (0.6, 1.8, and 5.2 nmol/kg), or vehicle. Food intake pattern was assessed during the dark phase using an automated weighing system that allowed continuous undisturbed monitoring of physiological eating behavior. Both CCK-8 and CCK-58 dose dependently reduced 1-h, dark-phase food intake, with an equimolar dose of 1.8 nmol being similarly effective (-49% and -44%). CCK-58 increased the latency to the first meal, whereas CCK-8 did not. The intermeal interval was reduced after CCK-8 (1.8 nmol/kg, -41%) but not after CCK-58. At this dose, CCK-8 increased the satiety ratio by 80% and CCK-58 by 160%, respectively, compared with vehicle. When behavior was assessed manually, CCK-8 reduced locomotor activity (-31%), whereas grooming behavior was increased (+59%). CCK-58 affected neither grooming nor locomotor activity. In conclusion, reduction of food intake by CCK-8 and CCK-58 is achieved by differential modulation of food intake microstructure and behavior. These data highlight the importance of studying the molecular forms of peptides that exist in vivo in tissue and circulation of the animal being studied.

Indexed as

AnimalsCholecystokininCircadian RhythmDose-Response Relationship, DrugEatingFeeding BehaviorGroomingInjections, IntraperitonealMaleMotor ActivityPhotoperiodRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReaction TimeSatiety ResponseSincalideCholecystokinincholecystokinin 58Sincalide

Identifiers

PMID22874423
PMCPMC3469663
OpenAlexW2116843456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.