Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22874123›Full record

ArticlePhysical biology2012

Pareto evolution of gene networks: an algorithm to optimize multiple fitness objectives.

Aryeh Warmflash, Paul Francois, Eric D Siggia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Morphogens in the evolution of size, shape and patterning.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. NetExplore: a web server for modeling small network motifs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015
    Article
  11. Mechanistic links between cellular trade-offs, gene expression, and growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aryeh WarmflashCenter for Studies in Physics and Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Paul Francois
Eric D Siggia

Funding

MOLECULAR BASIS OF NEURAL DEVELOPMENT IN XENOPUSR01HD032105 · NICHD · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI BRIVANLOU, ALI H · 1996 to 2010
$2.9M
Dynamic readout of TGFb signaling and modeling of cell fate specification in humaR01GM101653 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI BRIVANLOU, ALI H, SIGGIA, ERIC D. · 2012 to 2020
$2.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD032105NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD32105NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The computational evolution of gene networks functions like a forward genetic screen to generate, without preconceptions, all networks that can be assembled from a defined list of parts to implement a given function. Frequently networks are subject to multiple design criteria that cannot all be optimized simultaneously. To explore how these tradeoffs interact with evolution, we implement Pareto optimization in the context of gene network evolution. In response to a temporal pulse of a signal, we evolve networks whose output turns on slowly after the pulse begins, and shuts down rapidly when the pulse terminates. The best performing networks under our conditions do not fall into categories such as feed forward and negative feedback that also encode the input-output relation we used for selection. Pareto evolution can more efficiently search the space of networks than optimization based on a single ad hoc combination of the design criteria.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Regulatory NetworksModels, GeneticBiological EvolutionFeedback

Identifiers

PMID22874123
PMCPMC3609408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.