ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2012
Modularity as a source of new morphological variation in the mandible of hybrid mice.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morphological diversity of dental and mandibular deformities inCurrent zoology · 2026Article
- Intraspecific Variation in Life Cycle Impacts the Morphology of Alpine Newts.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
- Topological and variational modularity: A case study using the pectoral girdle across the Chrosomus eos-neogaeus hybridization complex.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026Article
- Mito-nuclear discordance reveals introgressive hybridization following vicariance and secondary contact in Iberian scorpions (Buthidae: Buthus).BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Inner ear morphology in wild versus laboratory house mice.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
- Craniodental divergence associated with bite force between hybridizing pine squirrels (Tamiasciurus).PloS one · 2023Article
- Wild versus lab house mice: Effects of age, diet, and genetics on molar geometry and topography.Journal of anatomy · 2022Article
- Penile shape discriminates two cryptic species ofZooKeys · 2022Article
- Interspecific hybridization can generate functional novelty in cichlid fish.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Unravelling the hybrid vigor in domestic equids: the effect of hybridization on bone shape variation and covariation.BMC evolutionary biology · 2019Article
- Investigating the evolution and development of biological complexity under the framework of epigenetics.Evolution & development · 2019Article
- Hybridization in human evolution: Insights from other organisms.Evolutionary anthropology · 2019Review
- Craniomandibular form and body size variation of first generation mouse hybrids: A model for hominin hybridization.Journal of human evolution · 2018Article
- Craniofacial shape transition across the house mouse hybrid zone: implications for the genetic architecture and evolution of between-species differences.Development genes and evolution · 2016Article
- Adaptive plasticity in the mouse mandible.BMC evolutionary biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHybridization is often seen as a process dampening phenotypic differences accumulated between diverging evolutionary units. For a complex trait comprising several relatively independent modules, hybridization may however simply generate new phenotypes, by combining into a new mosaic modules inherited from each parental groups and parts intermediate with respect to the parental groups. We tested this hypothesis by studying mandible size and shape in a set of first and second generation hybrids resulting from inbred wild-derived laboratory strains documenting two subspecies of house mice, Musmusculus domesticus and Musmusculus musculus. Phenotypic variation of the mandible was divided into nested partitions of developmental, evolutionary and functional modules.
resultsThe size and shape of the modules were differently influenced by hybridization. Some modules seemed to be the result of typical additive effects with hybrids intermediate between parents, some displayed a pattern expected in the case of monogenic dominance, whereas in other modules, hybrids were transgressive. The result is interpreted as the production of novel mandible morphologies. Beyond this modularity, modules in functional interaction tended to display significant covariations.
conclusionsModularity emerges as a source of novel morphological variation by its simple potential to combine different parts of the parental phenotypes into a novel offspring mosaic of modules. This effect is partly counterbalanced by bone remodeling insuring an integration of the mosaic mandible into a functional ensemble, adding a non-genetic component to the production of transgressive phenotypes in hybrids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.