Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22873753›Full record

Trial reportBMC family practice2012

Implementation of a lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes prevention in Dutch primary care: opportunities for intervention delivery.

Paulina W A Vermunt, Ivon E J Milder, Frits Wielaard, Caroline A Baan, Jos D M Schelfhout, Gert P Westert, Hans A M van Oers

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC family practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Collective Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases in an Ageing Population with Community Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Race and sex differences in dropout from the STRRIDE trials.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023
    Article
  10. Demographic, Clinical, and Psychosocial Predictors of Exercise Adherence: The STRRIDE Trials.Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paulina W A VermuntScientific Centre for Transformation in Care and Welfare (Tranzo), University of Tilburg, Warandelaan 2, 5037, AB, Tilburg, the Netherlands. prediabeteseindhoven@gmail.com
Ivon E J Milder
Frits Wielaard
Caroline A Baan
Jos D M Schelfhout
Gert P Westert
Hans A M van Oers
Tilburg University · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLHuisarts en Wetenschap · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs in clinical practice resources may be limited compared to experimental settings, translation of evidence-based lifestyle interventions into daily life settings is challenging. In this study we therefore evaluated the implementation of the APHRODITE lifestyle intervention for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in Dutch primary care. Based on this evaluation we discuss opportunities for refining intervention delivery.

methodsA 2.5-year intervention was performed in 14 general practices in the Netherlands among individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes (FINDRISC-score ≥ 13) (n = 479) and was compared to usual care (n = 446). Intervention consisted of individual lifestyle counselling by nurse practitioners (n = 24) and GPs (n = 48) and group-consultations. Drop-out and attendance were registered during the programme. After the intervention, satisfaction with the programme and perceived implementation barriers were assessed with questionnaires.

resultsDrop-out was modest (intervention: 14.6 %; usual care: 13.2 %) and attendance at individual consultations was high (intervention: 80-97 %; usual care: 86-94 %). Providers were confident about diabetes prevention by lifestyle intervention in primary care. Participants were more satisfied with counselling from nurse practitioners than from GPs. A major part of the GPs reported low self-efficacy regarding dietary guidance. Lack of counselling time (60 %), participant motivation (12 %), and financial reimbursement (11 %) were regarded by providers as important barriers for intervention implementation.

conclusionsHigh participant compliance and a positive attitude of providers make primary care a suitable setting for diabetes prevention by lifestyle counselling. Results support a role for the nurse practitioner as the key player in guiding lifestyle modification. Further research is needed on strategies that could increase cost-effectiveness, such as more stringent criteria for participant inclusion, group-counselling, more tailor-made counselling and integration of screening and / or interventions for different disorders.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Plan ImplementationLife StyleCounselingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsNurse PractitionersPatient CompliancePatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient Relations

Identifiers

PMID22873753
PMCPMC3457845
OpenAlexW2127474813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.