Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22873623›Full record

ReviewClinical drug investigation2012

Current status of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment in Japan: transarterial chemoembolization.

Osamu Matsui

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical drug investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Osamu MatsuiDepartment of Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Japan. matsuio@med.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
Kanazawa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the gold standard of treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and involves the administration of cytotoxic drugs, with or without lipiodol, by means of a catheter directly to the hepatic artery followed by the administration of embolizing agents such as spherical gelatin or polyvinyl alcohol particles. There are currently no global guidelines regarding the dose, choice or combination of cytotoxic agents for TACE; therefore it is difficult to compare data from different TACE studies. Superselective TACE with lipiodol is the primary TACE procedure that offers satisfactory levels of local control with a lower risk of complications. Approximately 40-70% of patients with HCC with tumours sized 4-5 cm or less attained complete tumour necrosis or remained local recurrence free for 3 years or longer following TACE. The early identification of unresponsiveness to TACE is important to allow for a timely switch to alternative therapies. The use of novel embolizing materials in TACE such as drug-eluting beads and radioembolization is likely to have beneficial effects. Indeed, the increase in angiogenic activity following TACE emphasizes the potential of TACE in combination with targeted molecular therapies such as the anti-angiogenesis inhibitor, sorafenib.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzenesulfonatesCarcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticEthiodized OilHumansJapanLiver NeoplasmsMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm StagingNeovascularization, PathologicNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzenesulfonatesEthiodized OilNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID22873623
OpenAlexW1599496801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.