ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2012
Pregnancy after Breast Cancer: Myths and Facts.
Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Breastfeeding is Possible: A Systematic Review on the Feasibility and Challenges of Breastfeeding Among Breast Cancer Survivors of Reproductive Age.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Prognosis of pregnancy after breast cancer diagnosis according to the type of treatment: A population-based study in Korea by the SMARTSHIP group.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Article
- Pregnancy after breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2022Review
- Infant feeding among women with a history of breast cancer.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2020Article
- Exogenous reproductive hormone use in breast cancer survivors and previvors.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2018Review
- Management of Potential Long-Term Toxicities in Breast Cancer Patients.Current breast cancer reports · 2016Article
- Managing breast cancer in younger women: challenges and solutions.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2016Review
- Breast cancer under age 40: a different approach.Current treatment options in oncology · 2015Review
- Hormonal therapies in young breast cancer patients: when, what and for how long?Journal of thoracic disease · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most young breast cancer survivors consider reproductive issues to be of great importance, but many questions remain undervalued and unanswered. Overall, available data support the safety and feasibility of pregnancy and breastfeeding after breast cancer. The accuracy of the evidence is however limited by: i) the retrospective and frequently incomplete population-based nature of the data, ii) data not representing the entire population, iii) patient-related effects, iv) underpowered sample size, and v) lack of control for biological factors and risk determinants. We review the available evidence in light of these limitations which outline the need for prospective data collection and focused priority research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.