Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22872780›Full record

ArticlemBio2012

Antisense transcription is pervasive but rarely conserved in enteric bacteria.

Rahul Raghavan, Daniel B Sloan, Howard Ochman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exopolysaccharides metabolism and cariogenesis ofJournal of oral microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Regulation of Heterogenous LexA Expression inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Complete identity and expression of StfZ, theFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rahul RaghavanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Microbial Diversity Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Daniel B Sloan
Howard Ochman
Yale University · US

Funding

Elucidating the origins and functions of unknown genesR01GM074738 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI OCHMAN, HOWARD · 2005 to 2009
$1.0M
Genomic Interactions between Psyllids and Their Obligately Intracellular BacteriaF32GM099334 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SLOAN, DANIEL BENJAMIN · 2011 to 2012
$96k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1F32GM099334-01NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM099334NIGMS NIH HHS GM74738NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noncoding RNAs, including antisense RNAs (asRNAs) that originate from the complementary strand of protein-coding genes, are involved in the regulation of gene expression in all domains of life. Recent application of deep-sequencing technologies has revealed that the transcription of asRNAs occurs genome-wide in bacteria. Although the role of the vast majority of asRNAs remains unknown, it is often assumed that their presence implies important regulatory functions, similar to those of other noncoding RNAs. Alternatively, many antisense transcripts may be produced by chance transcription events from promoter-like sequences that result from the degenerate nature of bacterial transcription factor binding sites. To investigate the biological relevance of antisense transcripts, we compared genome-wide patterns of asRNA expression in closely related enteric bacteria, Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, by performing strand-specific transcriptome sequencing. Although antisense transcripts are abundant in both species, less than 3% of asRNAs are expressed at high levels in both species, and only about 14% appear to be conserved among species. And unlike the promoters of protein-coding genes, asRNA promoters show no evidence of sequence conservation between, or even within, species. Our findings suggest that many or even most bacterial asRNAs are nonadaptive by-products of the cell's transcription machinery. IMPORTANCE Application of high-throughput methods has revealed the expression throughout bacterial genomes of transcripts encoded on the strand complementary to protein-coding genes. Because transcription is costly, it is usually assumed that these transcripts, termed antisense RNAs (asRNAs), serve some function; however, the role of most asRNAs is unclear, raising questions about their relevance in cellular processes. Because natural selection conserves functional elements, comparisons between related species provide a method for assessing functionality genome-wide. Applying such an approach, we assayed all transcripts in two closely related bacteria, Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and demonstrate that, although the levels of genome-wide antisense transcription are similarly high in both bacteria, only a small fraction of asRNAs are shared across species. Moreover, the promoters associated with asRNAs show no evidence of sequence conservation between, or even within, species. These findings indicate that despite the genome-wide transcription of asRNAs, many of these transcripts are likely nonfunctional.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coliGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenome, BacterialRNA, AntisenseRNA, BacterialSalmonella typhimuriumTranscription, GeneticBacterial ProteinsRNA, AntisenseRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID22872780
PMCPMC3419515
OpenAlexW2116373379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.