ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2012
Novel pHEMA-gelatin SPHs as bone scaffolds in dynamic cultures.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clarifying the Tooth-Derived Stem Cells Behavior in a 3D Biomimetic Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- A multicompartment holder for spinner flasks improves expansion and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in three-dimensional scaffolds.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effectiveness of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-gelatin superporous hydrogels (pHEMA-gelatin SPHs) was investigated for bone tissue engineering. The cell culture studies were performed with preosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Dynamic culture conditions were provided using 100 ml spinner flask rotating at 50 rpm. According to the results of mitochondrial activity test (1-3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-diphenyltetrazolium bromide), there is no significant difference between proliferation behavior of cells cultured under static and dynamic conditions during 28 days. Observations by scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy showed that, cells attached well onto the scaffolds and spread through the pores for both culture conditions. However, it was found that, calcium deposition and alkaline phosphatase activity in the scaffolds cultured under dynamic conditions were higher than that of static conditions. The expression of osteogenic differentiation markers, i.e. collagen I and osteopontin, based on real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction demonstrated increased responses under the spinner flask culture conditions. The combination of dynamic culture conditions in spinner flask with the use of superporous pHEMA-gelatin scaffolds enhanced the outcomes related to bone tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22872315What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.