GuidelineJournal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences2012
New diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis in revised Tokyo Guidelines.
Guideline in Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 94 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Extended Antibiotic Therapy in Postoperative of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Due to Acute Cholecystitis. Is it Necessary?
Effect Of Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy On Postoperative Mortality, Morbidity and Difficult Cholecystectomy In Patients With Grade II Cholecystitis According To Tokyo 2018 Guidelines: Prospective Randomised Study
Characteristics of the Attention Provided to Patients With Cholecystitis in Villavicencio Hospitals, Colombia: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Trial.
Who cites it
94 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk factors and mitigating measures associated with bile duct injury during cholecystectomy: meta-analysis.BJS open · 2025Pooled it
- Computed tomography versus ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2024Pooled it
- 2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2020Guideline
- Antibiotic administration after cholecystectomy for acute mild-moderate cholecystitis: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Pooled it
- Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.Journal of gastroenterology · 2017Guideline
- Management of acute cholecystitis in cancer patients: a comparative effectiveness approach.Surgical endoscopy · 2014Pooled it
- Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Routine use of ICG to enhance operative safety in emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Trial
- The Value of Abdominal Drainage After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Mild or Moderate Acute Calculous Cholecystitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.World journal of surgery · 2016Trial
- Efficacy and safety of B-mode ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly and high-risk patients.BMC gastroenterology · 2015Trial
- Observational
- Acalculous cholecystitis- an imaging and therapeutic update.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- The role of serum and urıne neopterın levels on the determınatıon of acute cholecystıtıs severıty.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Acalculous Cholecystitis: The Unexpected Mask of De Novo Heart Failure.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value of hematological parameters in the early diagnosis of acute cholecystitis.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
- How do inflammatory marker dynamics shift with acute calculous cholecystitis severity?Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025Article
- Article
- Pericholecystic Fat Stranding as a Predictive Factor of Length of Stays of Patients with Acute Cholecystitis: A Novel Scoring Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Natural history of asymptomatic gallbladder stones in clinic without beds: A long-term prognosis over 10 years.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Clinical analysis of infectious mononucleosis complicated with acute acalculous cholecystitis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis (TG07) were published in 2007 as the world's first guidelines for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. The diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis have since been widely used all over the world. A validation study of TG07 has shown that the diagnostic criteria for acute cholecystitis are highly reliable but that the definition of definite diagnosis is ambiguous. In addition, considerable new evidence referring to acute cholecystitis as well as evaluations of TG07 have been published. Consequently, we organized the Tokyo Guidelines Revision Committee to evaluate TG07, recognize new evidence, and conduct a multi-center analysis to revise the guidelines (TG13). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed 451 patients with acute cholecystitis from multiple tertiary care centers in Japan. All 451 patients were first evaluated using the criteria in TG07. The "gold standard" for acute cholecystitis in this study was a diagnosis by pathology. The validity of TG07 diagnostic criteria was investigated by comparing clinical with pathological diagnosis.
resultsOf 451 patients evaluated, a total of 227 patients were given a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis by pathological examination (prevalence 50.3 %). TG07 criteria provided a definite diagnosis of acute cholecystitis in 224 patients. The sensitivity of TG07 diagnostic criteria for acute cholecystitis was 92.1 %, and the specificity was 93.3 %. Based on the preliminary results, new diagnostic criteria for acute cholecystitis were proposed. Using the new criteria, the sensitivity of definite diagnosis was 91.2 %, and the specificity was 96.9 %. The accuracy rate was improved from 92.7 to 94.0 %. In regard to severity grading among 227 patients, 111 patients were classified as Mild (Grade I), 104 as Moderate (Grade II), and 12 as Severe (Grade III).
conclusionThe proposed new diagnostic criteria achieved better performance than the diagnostic criteria in TG07. Therefore, the proposed criteria have been adopted as new diagnostic criteria for acute cholecystitis and are referred to as the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines (TG13). Regarding severity assessment, no new evidence was found to suggest that the criteria in TG07 needed major adjustment. As a result, TG07 severity assessment criteria have been adopted in TG13 with minor changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.